General Discussion

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)

8. That does not appear to be correct

Wed Feb 19, 2025, 12:05 PM

Feb 2025

The plaintiffs asked for a broader order than what the court granted. The administration's reply (at least as presented above) appears to be "what we're doing falls into the exceptions the court laid out".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, Trump has just told a federal judge in a court filing that his admin will not comply with the court's order [View all] bigtree Feb 2025 OP

WTF? malaise Feb 2025 #1

Yep, lock him up. GreenWave Feb 2025 #3

How? Redleg Feb 2025 #11

It would take a popular response. And as I have read Chris Hedges say LT Barclay Feb 2025 #15

So much for organized Labor Cirsium Feb 2025 #26

I don't think he meant organized labor but unions have little power now. LT Barclay Feb 2025 #36

And, who are they going to fill those jobs with? OldBaldy1701E Feb 2025 #30

I'm a Physical Therapist and not easy to replace but if I started LT Barclay Feb 2025 #38

Yes, but if they do this more than once or twice, their business won't survive. OldBaldy1701E Feb 2025 #41

By Punishing Those Who Carry Out His Illegal Orders Daleuhlmann Feb 2025 #40

I agree- but when will this happen? Redleg Feb 2025 #42

Red Line officially crossed ... wonder what comes next NotHardly Feb 2025 #14

Totalitarianism. Get ready for president Jared Kushner or Baron Trump next LT Barclay Feb 2025 #16

If the constitution is null and void Bettie Feb 2025 #37

Probably. If I had to pin the death blow to the Constitution LT Barclay Feb 2025 #39

His Justice Department is going to arrest him? LudwigPastorius Feb 2025 #21

I'm confused ScratchCat Feb 2025 #2

I had the wrong article linked about Judge Amir's ruling bigtree Feb 2025 #4

If this stands, Marbury v. Madison is dead. As are courts, and Congressional laws. All of them. nt bucolic_frolic Feb 2025 #5

Constitutional Crisis is upon us. spanone Feb 2025 #6

I think we've been swimming in a constitutional crisis since his first term momta Feb 2025 #18

That's what's gonna happen. Why else, do you think he fired the 3Hotdogs Feb 2025 #31

And they laughed when we said he'd be a dictator iemanja Feb 2025 #7

That does not appear to be correct FBaggins Feb 2025 #8

That's how I read it to ScratchCat Feb 2025 #9

I don't believe the judge will think this is complying bigtree Feb 2025 #10

and just who does anyone think will enforce the judicial ruling? The DOJ, FBI, and army heads are all controlled by JohnSJ Feb 2025 #12

When you'r a Fuhrer, they let you do it. Attilatheblond Feb 2025 #13

Doesn't surprise me. What is surprising is the support he seems to have from veterans. JohnSJ Feb 2025 #19

"Voters" have allowed this to take place DENVERPOPS Feb 2025 #24

Luigi masmdu Feb 2025 #33

I'm confused. markodochartaigh Feb 2025 #17

Everybody who had 'Constitutional Crisis in the First 30 Days' on their bingo card can mark that off. LudwigPastorius Feb 2025 #20

Trump will fight this hard 4catsmom Feb 2025 #22

Well this is the party that ignores subpoenas..... Owens Feb 2025 #23

Contempt of court wryter2000 Feb 2025 #25

Remove him. hadEnuf Feb 2025 #27

He's the final arbiter of law now. Elect a criminal, expect crimes to be committed surfered Feb 2025 #28

Okay now file a contempt charge.............his treasous staff and himself just admitted they will not comply..... turbinetree Feb 2025 #29

That Constitutinal Crisis That We've All Been Fearing Has Begun! Daleuhlmann Feb 2025 #32

Who? How? Sounds good but who and how? Srkdqltr Feb 2025 #34

Thanks, Merrick Garland for failing to prosecute the first Trump crime wave and turning him loose to do it exponentially NBachers Feb 2025 #35

lol bigtree Feb 2025 #43