Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uponit7771

(93,532 posts)
21. It's not the money it's the equipment... US sent old to be trashed equipment and paid ourselves to restock. It wasn't 35
Mon Mar 3, 2025, 12:38 AM
Mar 2025

... 350 like MAGA has been saying it was a 3rd of that and a 3rd of that number going to direct aid.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think they understand that even if it would be much tougher without our Wingus Dingus Mar 2025 #1
Unfortunately, they probably do need the US. Self Esteem Mar 2025 #2
"There's absolutely no chance Europe can make up that difference heading forward." HereForTheParty Mar 2025 #3
I don't think they could collectively make up that gap. Self Esteem Mar 2025 #4
They NO DOUBT can take up that gap Ukr took Kursk with 20% NATO equipment use outside... uponit7771 Mar 2025 #16
And they have now been partially pushed back DetroitLegalBeagle Mar 2025 #30
Check your sources, there are a crap ton of Russian talking points in your uponit7771 Mar 2025 #33
Not right now - but remember the war machines that were created in WWII? dwayneb Mar 2025 #26
It is not so much the money but the ability Bev54 Mar 2025 #10
Europe doesn't need to have the biggest economy in the world to accomplish their goals. BannonsLiver Mar 2025 #5
If their goal is defeat Russia, they surely do lol Self Esteem Mar 2025 #20
Russia enid602 Mar 2025 #7
Russia is now using donkeys on the front lines and being pushed back ... uponit7771 Mar 2025 #9
It's going to be extremely tough. Self Esteem Mar 2025 #19
It's not the money it's the equipment... US sent old to be trashed equipment and paid ourselves to restock. It wasn't 35 uponit7771 Mar 2025 #21
It sounds like you're repeating Trump's propaganda which is 100% false. Wiz Imp Mar 2025 #13
Thanks Strelnikov_ Mar 2025 #14
Europe will essentially have to double its total to match what the US was doing - which is just one country. Self Esteem Mar 2025 #18
Also a big chuck of Mountainguy Mar 2025 #25
Your source literally proves my source. Self Esteem Mar 2025 #17
I'll never know why you think that showing facts that completely contradict what you Wiz Imp Mar 2025 #24
Money is the smaller problem. Actual production of war materials is the bigger one DetroitLegalBeagle Mar 2025 #31
Europe does not have the munitions and other equipment to do this.. berkerly6240 Mar 2025 #6
The only thing is, no one manufactures as much ammunition as we do. BlueTsunami2018 Mar 2025 #8
it was never about just them for the US bigtree Mar 2025 #11
Trump is Putin's missile lame54 Mar 2025 #12
I know this much. GoodRaisin Mar 2025 #15
I'm no expert, but I think we have specific weapons Sparkly Mar 2025 #22
Fox News took this away from us. Initech Mar 2025 #23
They're better off without the trump/musk admin fiasco. That's for sure. Previous admins, no. brush Mar 2025 #27
Remember - UK and France have nukes dwayneb Mar 2025 #28
The US has aligned with Ukraine's mortal enemy, Russia. Irish_Dem Mar 2025 #29
I think Ukraine can withstand America's surrender monkey act. Torchlight Mar 2025 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ukraine doesn't need us, ...»Reply #21