Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
  Post removed Fri Mar 7, 2025, 10:26 AM Mar 7

Post removed [View all]

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed [View all] Post removed Mar 7 OP
Context, please? mwmisses4289 Mar 7 #1
Going out on a limb here edhopper Mar 7 #2
I think it's an idea worth discussing in the abstract. It lies behind... LAS14 Mar 7 #8
It won't ForgedCrank Mar 7 #23
Bill Ayers said, each person is an expert in their own existence... CoopersDad Mar 7 #3
See my reply above (#8). nt LAS14 Mar 7 #9
I agree with your premise, appreciate the topic. CoopersDad Mar 7 #12
Is this in reference to the 1967 Loving v. VA supremne court decision? Torchlight Mar 7 #4
Sorry, I don't know that decision, but it could easily apply. See my reply #8. nt LAS14 Mar 7 #10
Mr & Mrs Loving sued for the right to be married, because under old miscegenation laws they could not Hekate Mar 7 #27
I don't think you are being as clever as you think you are. demmiblue Mar 7 #5
It's frustrating when people insist on attributing nefarious motives... LAS14 Mar 7 #11
Two things can be right. The issue is difficult to win on, and it is about complexity. What's wrong with that? RoeVWade Mar 7 #6
Ignoring any specific issue, there is an entire area of neuroscience dedicated to exploring complex verus hlthe2b Mar 7 #7
Yes thanks. The particular issue can be broken down into several categories. RoeVWade Mar 7 #13
Well stated! nt LAS14 Mar 7 #14
Thanks, appreciate it. RoeVWade Mar 7 #16
If someone can acknowledge complexity without acknowledging bigots have a point, I'd love to see it, because simply WhiskeyGrinder Mar 7 #15
Did you mean "admitting" instead of "admiring?" nt LAS14 Mar 7 #17
No WhiskeyGrinder Mar 7 #19
Well, both terms work leftstreet Mar 7 #18
I don't know how one can work toward a solution without acknowleging whatever complexity there is. nt LAS14 Mar 7 #20
It's not complex. Ms. Toad Mar 7 #21
Well, since replying to you would probably get me alerted, leading... LAS14 Mar 7 #22
That is about as clear as it can possibly be Hekate Mar 7 #32
Thank you for posting this. As the parent Luciferous Mar 7 #35
The complexity is introduced by bigots to give them cover. None of these issues are difficult to wrestle with. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 7 #25
Unfortunately, you're describing our dilemma pretty accurately. It's really, really... LAS14 Mar 7 #24
It is hard -- but it's optional. 🏳️‍⚧️ TommyT139 Mar 7 #28
Complexity? Cirsium Mar 7 #34
I don't think it is bigoted to state that Hamas attacked Israel. yardwork Mar 7 #26
Here. Let me help make this less complex for you BootOutTheGoons Mar 7 #29
I think that it's most important that we are not afraid to discuss without scolding Maru Kitteh Mar 7 #30
I feel like I've just been invited to another donnybrook Hekate Mar 7 #31
What is the complexity? LostOne4Ever Mar 7 #33
I agree. Jim__ Mar 7 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed