Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Schumer is getting disemboweled on Bluesky. [View all]Autumn
(48,965 posts)69. It's not a valid point. Courts do stay open during a shut down. They have "carryover" funds
Last edited Fri Mar 14, 2025, 01:41 PM - Edit history (1)
from previous years available.
Would federal courts shut down? How would pending cases be treated? Would timelines keep running?
According to the House Committee on the Judiciary, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AO) has said that the Federal Judiciary would not have to shut down immediately because of the availability of other sources of funds. During previous shutdowns, the Judiciary used fee revenues and carryover funds from prior years to support what it considered its essential function of hearing and deciding cases, including payment of salaries and benefits of all judges and court employees, as well as support and administrative. These funds should sustain Judiciary activities for approximately ten working days after an appropriations lapse. Once these balances are exhausted, if a lapse in appropriations still exists, each court will need to limit its operations to mission-critical activities, but the AO expects most judicial functions should continue during any appropriations lapse.
According to the House Committee on the Judiciary, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AO) has said that the Federal Judiciary would not have to shut down immediately because of the availability of other sources of funds. During previous shutdowns, the Judiciary used fee revenues and carryover funds from prior years to support what it considered its essential function of hearing and deciding cases, including payment of salaries and benefits of all judges and court employees, as well as support and administrative. These funds should sustain Judiciary activities for approximately ten working days after an appropriations lapse. Once these balances are exhausted, if a lapse in appropriations still exists, each court will need to limit its operations to mission-critical activities, but the AO expects most judicial functions should continue during any appropriations lapse.
U.S. courts should continue to hear and decide cases without interruption. Thus, all cases including civil and criminal, old and new should be processed and argued, and judgments should be issued and enforced, according to normal schedules and priorities.
https://latta.house.gov/faqgovernmentshutdown/federalprojectsandoperations.htm#:~:text=U.S.%20courts%20should%20continue%20to,to%20normal%20schedules%20and%20priorities.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Have a lot of anger too, but not sure this helps. Democratic primaries need to start early for midterms
Silent Type
Mar 2025
#3
WE need to stop Musk or I am not sure we survive for the next primary...this Bill
Demsrule86
Mar 2025
#76
Voting for the CR is like helping the chop shop dismantle what's' left of your car they just stole
ImNotGod
Mar 2025
#8
It's not a valid point. Courts do stay open during a shut down. They have "carryover" funds
Autumn
Mar 2025
#69
LOL With what MSM to actually cover any of it? We can't get them to tell the truth about Trump.
mucholderthandirt
Mar 2025
#38
I'm surprised the way hate and love change year to year. I had to pinch myself when I saw that headline on DU.
C Moon
Mar 2025
#15
Either way it will be a no win situation for the country and the party, and with a situation like that it could be
JohnSJ
Mar 2025
#22
Of course there's a good option: FIGHT. Fight like a motherfucker, for the country and the people.
mucholderthandirt
Mar 2025
#40
He is, atm, the most powerful elected Democrat in the US. His actions impact all Americans, so non-NYers can give
Celerity
Mar 2025
#61
fair enough, & hopefully NY Dems either make it clear he needs to retire, or barring that, they replace him via the vote
Celerity
Mar 2025
#74
Good...and I would strongly encourage everyone to read Adam Schiff's statement on the matter if you haven't already.
Karasu
Mar 2025
#32
The Dem response to everything is to go more right of center, when the people want the opposite.
mucholderthandirt
Mar 2025
#41
Good. I will be voting for the New York primary challengers to my Senators in future elections.
Scrivener7
Mar 2025
#44
You have to go there to express the true pulse, got the fan club out here policing
Nimble_Idea
Mar 2025
#63