General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Schumer supports Trump's decision to pull $400 million from Columbia [View all]Phoenix61
(18,331 posts)Im curious how you think about how protests should be addressed, considering the context of what you just said. The Trump administration just announced its pulling $400 million in funding from Columbia University, giving the reason as relentless violence, intimidation and antisemitic harassment. Im wondering what you make of that. Columbia did not do enough. I criticized them. And believe me, I believe in free speech, I believe in the right to protest, as you read in my book. I started my career protesting the Vietnam War. I say to some people, If I were your age, Id be protesting something or other. So I get that, and I love it, and its about America. But when it shades over to violence and antisemitism, the colleges had to do something, and a lot of them didnt do enough. They shrugged their shoulders, looked the other way. Columbia among them. So what did they do? They took away $400 million. Im trying to find out what they took away. Are they taking away money from cancer research, or Alzheimers? What is the $400 million? It could be hurting all students. Students who go there who have nothing to do with the protest, students who might have protested peacefully, or Jewish students who were victims of some of those protests. So I think we have to see. My worry is that this $400 million was just done in typical Trump fashion: indiscriminately, without looking at its effect.
That sounds easy. But when were talking about the right to protest, breaking the law, not breaking the law those things can be weaponized for political purposes. You can arrest political protesters, put them in prison, but theyre actually taking part in what is their constitutionally protected right. Well, if theyre just protesting, and theyre arrested, they shouldnt be arrested for protesting as long as they go by the rules. Look, I get protests in front of my house all the time, but they have to have a permit and they have to obey certain rules. There are rules. But the bottom line is we have courts, and Khalil will go to court. And I have a lot of faith that the judge will give a fair ruling. Its not the Trump administration, its an independent federal judge. [The day after we spoke, Schumer tweeted that Khalil should be punished by the legal system only for breaking criminal law, not for breaking university rules.]
Edit history
Recommendations
11 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):