Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Phoenix61

(18,684 posts)
11. She's lying. No where in the interview does he say that.
Sun Mar 16, 2025, 12:29 PM
Mar 2025

“I’m curious how you think about how protests should be addressed, considering the context of what you just said. The Trump administration just announced it’s pulling $400 million in funding from Columbia University, giving the reason as “relentless violence, intimidation and antisemitic harassment.” I’m wondering what you make of that. Columbia did not do enough. I criticized them. And believe me, I believe in free speech, I believe in the right to protest, as you read in my book. I started my career protesting the Vietnam War. I say to some people, “If I were your age, I’d be protesting something or other.” So I get that, and I love it, and it’s about America. But when it shades over to violence and antisemitism, the colleges had to do something, and a lot of them didn’t do enough. They shrugged their shoulders, looked the other way. Columbia among them. So what did they do? They took away $400 million. I’m trying to find out what they took away. Are they taking away money from cancer research, or Alzheimer’s? What is the $400 million? It could be hurting all students. Students who go there who have nothing to do with the protest, students who might have protested peacefully, or Jewish students who were victims of some of those protests. So I think we have to see. My worry is that this $400 million was just done in typical Trump fashion: indiscriminately, without looking at its effect.”

“That sounds easy. But when we’re talking about the right to protest, breaking the law, not breaking the law — those things can be weaponized for political purposes. You can arrest political protesters, put them in prison, but they’re actually taking part in what is their constitutionally protected right. Well, if they’re just protesting, and they’re arrested, they shouldn’t be arrested for protesting as long as they go by the rules. Look, I get protests in front of my house all the time, but they have to have a permit and they have to obey certain rules. There are rules. But the bottom line is we have courts, and Khalil will go to court. And I have a lot of faith that the judge will give a fair ruling. It’s not the Trump administration, it’s an independent federal judge. [The day after we spoke, Schumer tweeted that Khalil should be punished by the legal system only for breaking criminal law, not for breaking university rules.]”

Recommendations

11 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Schumer should have a town hall. He should answer for this stuff. Walleye Mar 2025 #1
He can't - his book tour starts tomorrow. hatrack Mar 2025 #5
Oh yeah, I guess that's important to him Walleye Mar 2025 #7
And it's not just a book tour -- he's CHARGING for tickets. Nanjeanne Mar 2025 #9
A learning from trump ? republianmushroom Mar 2025 #13
Chuck Schumer postpones book tour amid liberal criticism over spending vote Celerity Mar 2025 #44
Of course he does. JanMichael Mar 2025 #2
trmp must have something awful on chuck. spanone Mar 2025 #3
Schumer's Manchin side is being exposed. jalan48 Mar 2025 #4
It is not illegal, in the United States, johnnyfins Mar 2025 #6
And with Trump in power thanks in large part to certain protestors ZRB Mar 2025 #26
And I got Juried twice yesterday for bashing that jerk! LW1977 Mar 2025 #8
Didn't know you could say fuck you to other DU members good to know sdaz Mar 2025 #35
You can't. A belated welcome to DU. Ellipsis Mar 2025 #49
The bluesky comments are brutal. sop Mar 2025 #10
She's lying. No where in the interview does he say that. Phoenix61 Mar 2025 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author tritsofme Mar 2025 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author rollin74 Mar 2025 #18
Please show anywhere in the paragraphs above where he "opposes" anything Trump did. hatrack Mar 2025 #23
Here's a link to the entire transcript EdmondDantes_ Mar 2025 #31
Thank you! hatrack Mar 2025 #32
thank you for posting this rollin74 Mar 2025 #16
So he is not opposed to it edhopper Mar 2025 #20
He specifically says it's about violence and antisemitism. He's talking about laws. chowder66 Mar 2025 #29
He conditioned his approval angrychair Mar 2025 #34
It should be conditioned in respect to the law and the question at hand in the interview. chowder66 Mar 2025 #40
No edhopper Mar 2025 #36
That's your opinion and I respect it but I don't internalize it the same way as you do. chowder66 Mar 2025 #41
I checked her "Handbasket". GreenWave Mar 2025 #24
Nowhere did he disagree with Trump taking the $400 million HereForTheParty Mar 2025 #39
OMG hlthe2b Mar 2025 #12
He sounds compromised. 2naSalit Mar 2025 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Initech Mar 2025 #27
I sure would like to read the whole article but I don't have a subscription and I tried using chowder66 Mar 2025 #17
here Celerity Mar 2025 #45
Schumer is not the right leader for this time but ibegurpard Mar 2025 #19
Or to put it simply. The BlueSky poster lied. And this OP is misinformation. tritsofme Mar 2025 #21
She is an independent journalist. She scooped the MSM recently. chowder66 Mar 2025 #22
here Celerity Mar 2025 #46
I can't find any place where he said that. MineralMan Mar 2025 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author ananda Mar 2025 #28
Academic freedom is VITAL alarimer Mar 2025 #30
I don't have blue sky stoned Mar 2025 #33
He needs to go...primary him. Demsrule86 Mar 2025 #37
Americans don't need education. They just need to be obedient and keep their mouths shut about free speech. Ping Tung Mar 2025 #38
I take it that you believe hate speech laws are unconstitutional? MichMan Mar 2025 #42
No. But, that's why we have courts and judges to decide the constitutionality of speech. Trump isn't a judge. Ping Tung Mar 2025 #43
Some colleges stood by and permitted anti semetic speech towards Jewish students MichMan Mar 2025 #47
Were the colleges indiceted or tried for any crimes? Ping Tung Mar 2025 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Schumer supports Trump's ...»Reply #11