General Discussion

hlthe2b

(114,107 posts)

21. His stance since Trump took those actions--not to support Columbia or other universities--including those

Sun Mar 16, 2025, 02:08 PM

Mar 2025

in his own state and not to support the law regarding illegal deportation of a legal immigrant because of his 1st Amendment-protected viewpoints with which Trump admin/Schumer disagrees. I was no proponent of those protests, but I AM in terms of protecting the Constitution. Like I said this is being reported by some valid sources, but I still want it fully confirmed--and if so, I can not abide by Schumer's actions/stances.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I sense Schumers choice to support the CR was correct... [View all] FarPoint Mar 2025 OP

IF (if) it is TRUE that Schumer supported Trump's denial of $400 million to Columbia--as well as hlthe2b Mar 2025 #1

Was that issue in the CR? FarPoint Mar 2025 #15

His stance since Trump took those actions--not to support Columbia or other universities--including those hlthe2b Mar 2025 #21

The way I see it.... FarPoint Mar 2025 #23

He had bad choices XanaDUer2 Mar 2025 #2

No, you and he are wrong. CivicGrief Mar 2025 #3

1000% right... you speak for me!! Thank you. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2025 #9

EXACTLY!!! Now MAGA can say the decision was bipartisan!!! uponit7771 Mar 2025 #12

Getting those powers back will be a battle. The next bill will be worse. -nt CrispyQ Mar 2025 #28

Calling people MAGAs who do not agree with you is a poor strategy. Irish_Dem Mar 2025 #4

+1 Emile Mar 2025 #18

I use it as a generalized group for conversation simplicity. FarPoint Mar 2025 #26

+1 Terry_M Mar 2025 #30

Post removed Post removed Mar 2025 #5

Yeah riiigght. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2025 #11

How dare you say that? As a Jew I'm appalled. I don't alert but this sure warrants it. Nanjeanne Mar 2025 #14

not reading THAT into this situation at ALL stopdiggin Mar 2025 #17

What a cheap shot. Yavin4 Mar 2025 #19

That's not what that pain is, dear. Are you sitting on something sharp, perhaps? Scrivener7 Mar 2025 #20

You really should self delete your divisive post. Emile Mar 2025 #25

right. You win the prize! Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #27

So, any disagreement with Schumer's actions Bettie Mar 2025 #32

You are incorrect and have done a disservice with that comment. William769 Mar 2025 #34

Not!! notinkansas Mar 2025 #35

It Was The Kobayashi Maru Test Deep State Witch Mar 2025 #6

Give me a fucking break! CivicGrief Mar 2025 #7

Sorry, this is a reply to tritofme CivicGrief Mar 2025 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2025 #13

They were and are shutting the government down. NT. Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #29

Actually it wasn't. The repubs were the ones who changed the rules & without any dem input, either. CrispyQ Mar 2025 #31

Keep hearing this angrychair Mar 2025 #36

Exactly...... FarPoint Mar 2025 #44

We **HAD** political leverage where there was no procedural leverage. Now MAGA can claim material support from dems uponit7771 Mar 2025 #10

whichever side your 'personal' opinion falls here stopdiggin Mar 2025 #16

No Mountainguy Mar 2025 #22

They do know now Bettie Mar 2025 #33

I am sorry but I believe what we have here is betrayal...Schumer and all other need Demsrule86 Mar 2025 #38

Your sense is non. nt. Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #24

No it was not right...and nor is his statement about Columbia. Demsrule86 Mar 2025 #37

One thing I know for sure: If the gov't was shut down, DOGE would not be...nt Wounded Bear Mar 2025 #39

If there was a shutdown, Musk and Doge would have been free to put all of their cuts in LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #40

K&R betsuni Mar 2025 #41

Agree ... nt Raine Mar 2025 #42

So this vote will stop the Trump destruction. Emile Mar 2025 #43