Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

sop

(18,821 posts)

6. Chuck's campaign donors:

Reply to gab13by13 (Original post)

Mon Mar 17, 2025, 08:48 AM

Mar 2025

https://www.followthemoney.org/entity-details?eid=19890086

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

LiberalArkie lark Emile

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rejecting The Horrible CR Would Have Had Horrible Consequences For Someone [View all] gab13by13 Mar 2025 OP

They had no option of rejecting the CR FBaggins Mar 2025 #1

I do not understand your post gab13by13 Mar 2025 #2

The option was between the CR and a government shutdown EdmondDantes_ Mar 2025 #3

The government shutdown has been in progress Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #4

When I am clearing some brush on my property, I think: usonian Mar 2025 #7

Agreed -- those 10 voted to allow the "custom" shutdown to continue LSparkle Mar 2025 #8

The notion going around that Trump wanted a shutdown was not true at all. gab13by13 Mar 2025 #9

That doesn't answer the question EdmondDantes_ Mar 2025 #11

The point was to return it to the house. Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #16

That would work if the House Republicans preferred the CR to a shutdown karynnj Mar 2025 #23

And again: they are permanently shutting down many parts of the government. Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #29

Of course there was a downside FBaggins Mar 2025 #32

There was no option of returning it to the House FBaggins Mar 2025 #28

The dates of his upcoming book tour maybe the reason he didn't stop the horrid CR's passage. brush Mar 2025 #24

The choice was between fighting gab13by13 Mar 2025 #5

Except Musk was already doing that. EdmondDantes_ Mar 2025 #14

Hakeem Jeffries expected the CR to be killed gab13by13 Mar 2025 #18

You do realize "OMB director decides" is no different, right? FBaggins Mar 2025 #17

Sorry but making it political was the wrong choice gab13by13 Mar 2025 #19

Schumer didn't "hand the purse strings over to Musk" FBaggins Mar 2025 #25

In my belief, a shutdown might have prevented more of the agencies torn up since people would not be present LiberalArkie Mar 2025 #13

Chuck's campaign donors: sop Mar 2025 #6

One way to play poker is to always fold. Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #10

Except the ante is a lot more costly for Congress. gab13by13 Mar 2025 #12

The ante is zero. Voltaire2 Mar 2025 #15

To me the ante isn't political gab13by13 Mar 2025 #21

Aproving the CR is total abdication and will help enable the plutocracy that is forming. lark Mar 2025 #20

They gave Krasnov what he wanted and got absolutely nothing in return gab13by13 Mar 2025 #31

They had nine years to plan for this scenario. nt Hotler Mar 2025 #22

If the courts ran out of federal funds dlk Mar 2025 #26

This is a little weird. yardwork Mar 2025 #27

Update on the Book tour gab13by13 Mar 2025 #30

The tour would've been a complete shitshow of blowback everywhere he went, and he knows it AZJonnie Mar 2025 #33