Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'll take the hate for this [View all]Cirsium
(4,201 posts)75. Women in the Continental Army
Women whose husbands and fathers served on cannon crews hauled water to cool down and clean the cannon barrels and for the crew members to drink. These women were sometimes given the nickname of "Molly Pitcher" because they sometimes used pitchers to carry the water. Two of these women, Margaret Corbin and Mary Ludwig Hays, even helped serve on the cannon crews after their husbands were killed or wounded in battle. Corbin was wounded and received a soldier's pension. She is buried in West Point, NY.
https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/women-of-the-army.htm
https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/women-of-the-army.htm
New York teenager Sybil Ludington, was the female equivalent of Paul Revere, though she rode twice as far as Revere and in a driving rainstorm in April, 1777. Her ride took her through Putnam and Dutchess Counties, New York where she roused local militia to fight a British force that had attacked nearby Danbury, Connecticut. The Daughters of the American Revolution erected a heroic equestrian statue to Ludington in Carmel, New York along the forty-mile route she traveled.
...
Not unlike women eighty years later who disguised themselves as men to serve in the armies of the Civil War, women of the Revolutionary Era also itched to get into the fight, do their part for the cause, and be engaged in a historical moment. One of the best examples of a woman who disguised herself as a man to fight in the Continental Army was Deborah Sampson from Uxbridge, Massachusetts. Amazingly, she also has a paper trail concerning her combat service in the army, where she fought under the alias of Robert Shurtliff, the name of her deceased brother, in the light infantry company of the Fourth Massachusetts Regiment. She mustered into service in the spring of 1782 and saw action in Westchester County, New York just north of the City of New York where she was wounded in her thigh and forehead. Not wanting her identity to be revealed during medical care she permitted physicians to treat her head wound and then slipped out of the field hospital unnoticed, where she extracted one of the bullets from her thigh with a penknife and sewing needle. The other bullet was lodged too deep and her leg never fully healed. Her identity was finally revealed during the summer of 1783 when she contracted a fever while on duty in Philadelphia. The physician who treated her kept her secret and cared for her. After the Treaty of Paris, she was given an honorable discharge from the army by Henry Knox. Like other veterans of the Continental Army, she was continually petitioning the state and federal government for her service pension. She later married and had three children settling down in Sharon, Massachusetts. To help make ends meet she often gave public lectures about her wartime service. By the time she died in 1827, she was collecting minimal pensions for her service from Massachusetts and the federal government. In her memory a statue stands today outside the public library, in Sharon, honoring her Revolutionary War service and sacrifices.
https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/women-american-revolution
...
Not unlike women eighty years later who disguised themselves as men to serve in the armies of the Civil War, women of the Revolutionary Era also itched to get into the fight, do their part for the cause, and be engaged in a historical moment. One of the best examples of a woman who disguised herself as a man to fight in the Continental Army was Deborah Sampson from Uxbridge, Massachusetts. Amazingly, she also has a paper trail concerning her combat service in the army, where she fought under the alias of Robert Shurtliff, the name of her deceased brother, in the light infantry company of the Fourth Massachusetts Regiment. She mustered into service in the spring of 1782 and saw action in Westchester County, New York just north of the City of New York where she was wounded in her thigh and forehead. Not wanting her identity to be revealed during medical care she permitted physicians to treat her head wound and then slipped out of the field hospital unnoticed, where she extracted one of the bullets from her thigh with a penknife and sewing needle. The other bullet was lodged too deep and her leg never fully healed. Her identity was finally revealed during the summer of 1783 when she contracted a fever while on duty in Philadelphia. The physician who treated her kept her secret and cared for her. After the Treaty of Paris, she was given an honorable discharge from the army by Henry Knox. Like other veterans of the Continental Army, she was continually petitioning the state and federal government for her service pension. She later married and had three children settling down in Sharon, Massachusetts. To help make ends meet she often gave public lectures about her wartime service. By the time she died in 1827, she was collecting minimal pensions for her service from Massachusetts and the federal government. In her memory a statue stands today outside the public library, in Sharon, honoring her Revolutionary War service and sacrifices.
https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/women-american-revolution
It would be absurd to think that during a time like the American Revolution when emotions ran so high, families were being torn apart, and ones home, property, and lifestyle were at stake that there werent a handful of women who wanted to take up arms and pitch in. The military looked aside when young boys joined up. In many places boys as young as twelve were seen in the ranks. It was, therefore, not uncommon to see a soldier with no facial hair and one having a high voice. Since there were no real physical examinations for recruits, other than a cursory visual examination, some women who were not overly feminine in appearance, especially rural women whose hands and face showed a life of physical outdoor labor, were able to sneak into the ranks. The mores of the time dictated that a persons body be pretty much covered all the time and full bathing was very infrequent, so it is possible to believe no one might catch on to the deception. There is evidence, as in the case of Deborah Samson, that some women were known to be such by their messmates, but because of their fighting ability and toughness were accepted as equals.
https://www.continentalline.org/CL/article-000202/
https://www.continentalline.org/CL/article-000202/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No hate at all. You are correct. They don't realize what's waiting for them the second they call, "it's on." ...
marble falls
Mar 2025
#3
Admiral Yamamoto: "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."
sop
Mar 2025
#4
The point being, I'm not going to buy a gun so I can run into overwhelming odds to brutally die for a cause. nt
Gore1FL
Mar 2025
#14
They had M42 Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Guns, and support from U.S. adversaries providing for that proxy war.
Gore1FL
Mar 2025
#70
The Sky Warden, Sky Raider II whatever the hell they're calling it this week
Aviation Pro
Mar 2025
#97
I agree with your last line. But my point is, unlike a farmer in 1776, I am going to be outmatched in firepower.
Gore1FL
Mar 2025
#56
I kind of looked into requirements when i was arguing with a gun enthusiast.
usedtobedemgurl
Mar 2025
#95
Ha! It's the United States government that owns all the weapons.And we don't happen to be in that organization right now
Walleye
Mar 2025
#28
It is quite amazing to see the lack of posts calling for/supporting gun control since last November here. Kind
kelly1mm
Mar 2025
#29
While agree,, IF it happens the first line to be drawn will be within the military
Cheezoholic
Mar 2025
#48
I have heard local rumbling once in a while here. however, coffee still remains more important in my area than anything
Tetrachloride
Mar 2025
#49
I appreciate the spirit, but if they find compliant commanders willing to follow
surfered
Mar 2025
#62
...and how is a population armed with ARs and Glocks going to do against...
LudwigPastorius
Mar 2025
#100