General Discussion

struggle4progress

(126,177 posts)

72. He seems to be jockeying for the Roland Freisler medal

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Tue Apr 8, 2025, 10:56 AM

Apr 2025

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: Chief Justice Roberts has indefinitely blocked the court order requiring Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return tonight [View all] In It to Win It Apr 2025 OP

I'm not surprised are you? NT Tickle Apr 2025 #1

Saddened BOSSHOG Apr 2025 #4

I feel horrible 😭 NT Tickle Apr 2025 #5

Yes, yes, I am surprised. I knew that he was an abhorrent piece of excrement, but I thought maybe CJ had some . . . UniqueUserName Apr 2025 #7

I'm a bit surprised too newdeal2 Apr 2025 #11

That's what I guessed they would do in another thread and Tadpole Raisin Apr 2025 #21

Yes. I'm surprised. Baitball Blogger Apr 2025 #25

Right? Conjuay Apr 2025 #50

Scruples, Roberts never had them RANDYWILDMAN Apr 2025 #36

I'm not surprised because this probably is the best outcome we could hope for. onenote Apr 2025 #40

WTF? Chasstev365 Apr 2025 #2

Why? Quiet Em Apr 2025 #3

This man and this Court (except 3) are full-on MAGA. Cruel, evil, and yet AllyCat Apr 2025 #6

Fucking amazing how FAST they protect TSF!! bluestarone Apr 2025 #8

They turned a 2-month trial into a 4-year delay. Kid Berwyn Apr 2025 #68

Day 78, imagine day 178. NT Tickle Apr 2025 #9

Imagine day 1178 Wednesdays Apr 2025 #13

I can't imagine that far Tickle Apr 2025 #24

They don't want him back. NCDem47 Apr 2025 #10

I'm sure he's harmed. That's what they don't want the world to know. yardwork Apr 2025 #12

That's my take, too. highplainsdem Apr 2025 #18

At best he is harmed FHRRK Apr 2025 #27

I've thought that calling for his return would turn out to be his death warrant. n/t elocs Apr 2025 #43

I am starting to think that way Tickle Apr 2025 #31

kipande cha uchafu LoisB Apr 2025 #14

Arggh LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #15

Stuff like this needed to happen so Thrill Apr 2025 #16

Every one in the US is now fair game. Irish_Dem Apr 2025 #17

This is true!! Hope22 Apr 2025 #20

Including the Supreme Court. Because what the hell does he need them for now anyway? Efilroft Sul Apr 2025 #29

Yes if they cross him they could get disappeared too. Irish_Dem Apr 2025 #35

Well, fuck him. n/t returnee Apr 2025 #19

He's miles above the law. spanone Apr 2025 #22

That is not what has happened. madaboutharry Apr 2025 #23

I hope you're right. Baitball Blogger Apr 2025 #26

It is stated right in Robert's order. madaboutharry Apr 2025 #28

Even if you are correct, it is still a travesty of justice. UniqueUserName Apr 2025 #33

5 pm Tuesday, that is tomorrow. madaboutharry Apr 2025 #45

Yes, but that statement in no way guarantees a ruling. Only a response. A ruling might not follow ancianita Apr 2025 #58

Yes, he is correct... Butterflylady Apr 2025 #56

Thank you orangecrush Apr 2025 #30

I believe you are confused dpibel Apr 2025 #34

I am not confused and neither is Andrew Weissmann. madaboutharry Apr 2025 #47

I think we're all trying to make sense of this senseandsensibility Apr 2025 #49

If you don't think the stay is indefinite, then what is the definite length of stay you think is imposed? (nt) muriel_volestrangler Apr 2025 #59

"Until further order" dpibel Apr 2025 #60

They could have just let it happen angrychair Apr 2025 #61

No surprise. We no longer have a Constitution democracy Bread and Circuses Apr 2025 #32

I'd bet Garcia dies before this case reaches resolution Arazi Apr 2025 #37

He is a corrupt POS Meowmee Apr 2025 #38

I know folks are pissed, but it would have been worse if he had denied the stay request onenote Apr 2025 #39

Thanks for that explanation. /NT UniqueUserName Apr 2025 #44

We're so fortunate to have smart folks here on DU C_U_L8R Apr 2025 #53

To clarify -- I'm not predicting how the full court will rule, or what position Roberts will take. onenote Apr 2025 #55

Okk, so why did roberts allow full court to do this? bluestarone Apr 2025 #63

I'll try again. If Roberts denied the stay, Thomas would have granted it. onenote Apr 2025 #64

What i'm trying to understand, is why did Roberts give Garcia's lawyers until 5 pm Today to respond, but then bluestarone Apr 2025 #66

The full court hasn't decided anything with respect to Garcia's case. onenote Apr 2025 #67

So confusing. Hope you're not taking that i'm arguing with you. Just trying to understand decisions coming down. bluestarone Apr 2025 #70

Agree it can be confusing. onenote Apr 2025 #71

Roberts has tipped his hand as to which way he will be ruling. No more unexpected rulings elocs Apr 2025 #41

Maybe not. onenote Apr 2025 #42

It looks like a 24 hour stay, not "indefinite." Renew Deal Apr 2025 #46

The stay is indefinite. We have no indication for when their next order would come lifting the stay. In It to Win It Apr 2025 #48

I see what you mean Renew Deal Apr 2025 #51

'Don't look too much into it': Expert downplays SCOTUS ruling as MAGA cheers 'huge win!' LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #52

Then what? question everything Apr 2025 #57

Wtf? What kind of kompromat does slobby have on him??? SheltieLover Apr 2025 #54

Roberts, you're next. usonian Apr 2025 #62

And Putin's personal picks. Kid Berwyn Apr 2025 #69

!@#$%&*Z()_ AllaN01Bear Apr 2025 #65

He seems to be jockeying for the Roland Freisler medal struggle4progress Apr 2025 #72