Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I am not a gun person. But for the gun persons, how about you speak out? [View all]Stinky The Clown
(68,969 posts)30. There are extremes. My OP wasn't aimed at the. It was aimed at YOU.
You're called a gun nut because they have been so loud and obnoxious. You're called a gun nut because they feel this stupid need to protect themselves from harm with a gun. Harm from who, I would ask. They, or people just like them, are the mind of George Zimmerman, really, fearing black people in white neighborhoods.
The point of my OP is to start to speak out against the gun nuts.
I dare say people like you, responsible people, even enthusiastic collectors, outnumber the nuts.
By the way . . . . a harder question: is there any upper limit to the sheer number of guns one can/should own?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am not a gun person. But for the gun persons, how about you speak out? [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Dec 2012
OP
Here's your answer right here, Stinky, as to why hunters get tired of speaking up.
Brickbat
Dec 2012
#2
A family member shot a 12 point buck on the property here a couple of weeks ago
Fumesucker
Dec 2012
#7
agree completely - it's only the hunters who consider this a "sport" and themselves as "sportmen"
DrDan
Dec 2012
#29
Don't they know that it's only ethical to have someone *else* kill their food for them...
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2012
#60
Because it's impossible for anyone to shake the label that is unfairly thrown upon us
bossy22
Dec 2012
#6
The majority hold similar values, and yet a small contingent of RKBA-worshippers,
ThatPoetGuy
Dec 2012
#35
I am a lifetime gun ouner, shooter and hunter. I have no problem with sensible gun
doc03
Dec 2012
#11
To me, this is very much like the "why don't DU Christians do something about fundy nutjobs"
gkhouston
Dec 2012
#12
There is a massive difference between "being responible for them" being **hurt** by them.
Stinky The Clown
Dec 2012
#15
My only point, poorly made, is the official Iran news agency has no credibility.
former9thward
Dec 2012
#90
Yup, you do. You have a collection of things that have the primary purpose of hurting or killing
HERVEPA
Dec 2012
#21
:snap: You're right. .303, not .308 - hence the difficulty of finding ammo.
Stinky The Clown
Dec 2012
#57
Interesting choice for a screen name. Doesn't glorify violence or anything like that.
HERVEPA
Dec 2012
#31
I've owned and used guns and am not afraid of them. But anything beyond guns for food or
ancianita
Dec 2012
#44