Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I am not a gun person. But for the gun persons, how about you speak out? [View all]JohnnyRingo
(20,857 posts)66. Her first date with her spouse was at an NRA shooting meet.
I don't carry, and I advise my friends not to either because they aren't well trained enough to defend themselves (or others), but if I got the death threats Ms Maddow does, I might be inclined to change my mind.
That pic came from her interview in Rolling Stone where she outlined her stance on responsible ownership. You'll hear her call for stricter regulation and background checks (which she'd pass), but she doesn't advocate an outright ban as so many here do.
Keep in mind that she labels herself as a "liberal, which is to say an Eisenhower Republican". As one who grew up in the Ohio rust belt where people hunt, unions rule, and we vote 2 to 1 for democrats, I guess I identify with that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am not a gun person. But for the gun persons, how about you speak out? [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Dec 2012
OP
Here's your answer right here, Stinky, as to why hunters get tired of speaking up.
Brickbat
Dec 2012
#2
A family member shot a 12 point buck on the property here a couple of weeks ago
Fumesucker
Dec 2012
#7
agree completely - it's only the hunters who consider this a "sport" and themselves as "sportmen"
DrDan
Dec 2012
#29
Don't they know that it's only ethical to have someone *else* kill their food for them...
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2012
#60
Because it's impossible for anyone to shake the label that is unfairly thrown upon us
bossy22
Dec 2012
#6
The majority hold similar values, and yet a small contingent of RKBA-worshippers,
ThatPoetGuy
Dec 2012
#35
I am a lifetime gun ouner, shooter and hunter. I have no problem with sensible gun
doc03
Dec 2012
#11
To me, this is very much like the "why don't DU Christians do something about fundy nutjobs"
gkhouston
Dec 2012
#12
There is a massive difference between "being responible for them" being **hurt** by them.
Stinky The Clown
Dec 2012
#15
My only point, poorly made, is the official Iran news agency has no credibility.
former9thward
Dec 2012
#90
Yup, you do. You have a collection of things that have the primary purpose of hurting or killing
HERVEPA
Dec 2012
#21
:snap: You're right. .303, not .308 - hence the difficulty of finding ammo.
Stinky The Clown
Dec 2012
#57
Interesting choice for a screen name. Doesn't glorify violence or anything like that.
HERVEPA
Dec 2012
#31
I've owned and used guns and am not afraid of them. But anything beyond guns for food or
ancianita
Dec 2012
#44