Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZProgressive

(29,929 posts)
108. The big decision that could shape AOC's future
Wed Apr 30, 2025, 06:37 AM
Apr 2025

Nicholas Wu and Holly Otterbein
Wed, April 30, 2025 at 1:45 AM MST

Five months ago, she chose to play the inside game with her fellow House Democrats, running for her party’s top post on the high-profile Oversight Committee. She came up short to a more senior lawmaker, Rep. Gerry Connolly of Virginia, and left the committee entirely.

Now she has a second chance. Connolly unexpectedly announced Monday he will soon step aside for health reasons, leaving her with another critical choice — one made even more momentous by how much has changed inside the Democratic Party since she last chose to try and move up the House ranks.

Faced with the stresses of President Donald Trump’s second term, Democratic voters are yearning for younger and more assertive leadership. Many see exactly what they are looking for in Ocasio-Cortez, 35, who has traveled the country in recent months, packing rally after rally with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and fueling speculation about a potential White House run.

In other words, the stage afforded as ranking member of the House Oversight Committee is suddenly looking a whole lot smaller, and Ocasio-Cortez is remaining publicly and privately noncommittal as speculation swirls about Connolly’s successor.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/big-decision-could-shape-aoc-084500156.html

I decided to post this story here instead of starting another thread but is related to the topic of this thread.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who'da thunk it? BeyondGeography Apr 2025 #1
I've known three people who have had that cancer. He lasted longer than what I Autumn Apr 2025 #2
Post removed Post removed Apr 2025 #6
And I'm married to someone with that cancer and she's doing fine three years in. onenote Apr 2025 #41
I'm glad your wife is doing so well. My cousins son wasn't so lucky. nt Autumn Apr 2025 #50
Thank you for speaking out for the Congressman, who has always had a good reputation as a strong Dem Hekate Apr 2025 #69
Thanks onenote Apr 2025 #75
A fighter indeed Hekate Apr 2025 #82
Perhaps this is the time JBTaurus83 Apr 2025 #3
Or not... there are more senior and experienced people ahead of her.... getagrip_already Apr 2025 #30
She's not even a member of the Committee. onenote Apr 2025 #42
She was a member though, wasn't she. gab13by13 Apr 2025 #51
She was, but she chose instead to become a member of Energy and Commerce onenote Apr 2025 #52
Who didn't see this coming? IzzaNuDay Apr 2025 #4
Exactly. Connolly has served well, but should have stepped down from that position. Raven123 Apr 2025 #18
maybe it was his last wish? Give the guy a break LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #20
"Give him a break"? With Democracy on the line? That's a big negatory, good buddy. nt Shipwack Apr 2025 #23
He was not going to be the difference FFS. The GOP controls that committee and have not even had LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #34
My last fucking wish could be America doesn't become Alpeduez21 Apr 2025 #24
A fascist Demicratic party would have dumped him.nt delisen Apr 2025 #32
He wasn't going to keep us away from fascism, FFS LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #33
Agree and it's delusional to think otherwise imo Meowmee Apr 2025 #107
Bit of a harsh take, I think. Make a wish? yorkster Apr 2025 #84
The US Congress isn't the Make-A-Wish Foundation, especially in these times of the darkly looming Trumpian dictatorship. Celerity Apr 2025 #46
A fine strategy at the country club, but not Congress. Duncan Grant Apr 2025 #89
" hasn't exactly been energized to take on an existential political fight for the soul of the nation..." IrishBubbaLiberal Apr 2025 #5
not just a bad idea Skittles Apr 2025 #11
But... but... but... You don't understand! Shipwack Apr 2025 #25
OH! OH! and it would be AGEIST to not give him his turn! Skittles Apr 2025 #27
I am thinking that the Democratic Party that survives this Trump mess Dan Apr 2025 #7
One would hope. sop Apr 2025 #9
it will be a different party, for sure LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #21
Pelosi's belief in the Old School DEMs to the detriment of all Democrats. IrishBubbaLiberal Apr 2025 #8
gee, who would have thought that about a 75 year old with cancer Skittles Apr 2025 #10
Think u and I also used to agree a lot when DU first started IrishBubbaLiberal Apr 2025 #12
heyyyyy! Skittles Apr 2025 #13
What ageist and ableist claptrap. Ms. Toad Apr 2025 #14
No, it is not ageist, it is about truth. Brenda Apr 2025 #15
That would be true IF the fact of AOC's age were what was used to reject her. Ms. Toad Apr 2025 #17
Preach! Oopsie Daisy Apr 2025 #92
So why was AOC passed over for a guy with cancer that admits he wasn't doing the job and is stepping down. Cuthbert Allgood Apr 2025 #97
Was someone stating it was the fact of her age that was used to select him over her? Ms. Toad Apr 2025 #99
Totally agree. This isn't about any old school Dem leadership. ancianita Apr 2025 #16
I agree, will never understand why so many are so quick to throw experience out with the bath water... blue_jay Apr 2025 #19
I do believe Conolly got the job because Pelosi stepped in and Pelosi's MadameButterfly Apr 2025 #22
The same thing happened in Texas when Jessica Cisneros ran against Henry Cuellar Rob H. Apr 2025 #72
Congress is the worst example to use for throwing experience out EdmondDantes_ Apr 2025 #49
Thank you for saying this Hekate Apr 2025 #71
Thank you, Gerry Connolly, for your years of service. I hope you recover from your cancer. Gore1FL Apr 2025 #26
AOC will not "slide in" to the position of Ranking Member on the Oversight Committee. lapucelle Apr 2025 #35
I apologize that I didn't spell out the complete process. Gore1FL Apr 2025 #45
She can still be elected the ranking member of the Oversight Committee, but she needs a waiver from Dem House leadership Celerity Apr 2025 #48
She also needs the votes of the Democratic members. comradebillyboy Apr 2025 #63
Lots of folks don't seem to have any idea about how any of this works. lapucelle Apr 2025 #79
Yes, one of the chronic disinformation mongers was blaming Nixie Apr 2025 #96
And it was a secret ballot. lapucelle Apr 2025 #98
As always, a perfect explanation and needed reality/info. Nixie Apr 2025 #104
Well, that's a glorious pile of Malarkey (nt) NoRethugFriends Apr 2025 #81
well, of course she needs the votes, I was only discussing the procedure where she could even run for the position Celerity Apr 2025 #88
I certainly appreciate your explanation of the procedures. comradebillyboy Apr 2025 #101
AOC applied for a waiver to be allowed to serve on both committees. It wasn't granted. N/T lapucelle Apr 2025 #68
And she chose energy and commerce over oversight onenote Apr 2025 #77
Indeed she did. She's wanted to be on Energy and Commerce since her first term. N/T lapucelle Apr 2025 #80
😂🤣 Oopsie Daisy Apr 2025 #95
What part was funny? nt Gore1FL Apr 2025 #100
Cancer is so horrid! Just when you think you have it beat--it pops up its head again. I have known riversedge Apr 2025 #28
Not A Good Look, Nancy Chasstev365 Apr 2025 #29
Sorry to hear this. I hope that he gets treatment. This does not mean that AOC should just slide question everything Apr 2025 #31
AOC is no longer on the Oversight Committee. lapucelle Apr 2025 #36
And folks are excoriating David Hogg for proposing we boost new fighters Arazi Apr 2025 #37
What is it y'all used to say? "Your sons and your daughters are beyond your command..." Prairie Gates Apr 2025 #38
These positions are won by convincing members you are the best person for the job. No matter how much whining is done tritsofme Apr 2025 #39
I'm sure the Dems most powerful member putting her thumb on the scale meant nothing Arazi Apr 2025 #40
It was an open vote of the Democratic caucus, AOC overwhelmingly lost. tritsofme Apr 2025 #43
Pelosi is absolutely welcome to weigh in Arazi Apr 2025 #44
Yes, Pelosi has done much to earn the respect of her colleagues, and her opinion matters to them. tritsofme Apr 2025 #47
Are you implying AOC was wrong to challenge Connelly? Arazi Apr 2025 #56
Not at all, I think it was a valuable learning experience for her. tritsofme Apr 2025 #60
Was she not "owning" her loss? Did I miss something? Arazi Apr 2025 #62
No, you're right, she handled it fine. However some supporters, OPs like this being a good example tritsofme Apr 2025 #64
And in typical fashion, the deciders got it wrong. Renew Deal Apr 2025 #53
She's free to try again. tritsofme Apr 2025 #54
No. A lot of times they're won because the leadership is pleasing the corporate donors Sky Jewels Apr 2025 #59
If you think that is an accurate description of Nancy Pelosi, you are off your rocker. tritsofme Apr 2025 #61
It's disgusting slander meant to discourage support of Democrats and encourage hate for them. betsuni Apr 2025 #66
Down thread, someone called supporters of Connolly the "cancer of the party". N/T lapucelle Apr 2025 #86
Dt, someone called people slipping in needless digs at AOC in their praises for Rep Conolly "cancer of the party SunImp Apr 2025 #105
Yep. And while going after fellow Democrats might earn you a lot of likes on social media... W_HAMILTON Apr 2025 #106
It is so nice to see the enthusiasm at DU regarding someone's demise, and open the door JohnSJ Apr 2025 #55
Yes, that lust to hate Democrats. betsuni Apr 2025 #58
I wish him well - truly. I will add, health aside, he wasn't right for the moment. I hope that the party... themaguffin Apr 2025 #57
I wish him well and I hope his replacement is someone who's as experienced and respected as he is. Oopsie Daisy Apr 2025 #65
It's part of the rule of never giving Democrats the benefit of the doubt, assuming evil corrupt motives betsuni Apr 2025 #67
Reasons? You want reasons? --- Well... I'd start by suggesting that vanity and arrogance and virtue signaling... Oopsie Daisy Apr 2025 #90
I have to remind myself: Nothing is better than something, incrementalism and compromise for progress is a sin. betsuni Apr 2025 #103
Well, his selection kept AOC from getting the job, so he's served his purpose nt Rob H. Apr 2025 #70
Connolly was elected by the Oversight Committee, recommended by the Steering Committee, lapucelle Apr 2025 #73
The usual cancer of the party out here complimenting Connolly, but at the same time SunImp Apr 2025 #74
There's a pretty sizable portion of DU posters comprised of older, conservative Democrats nt Rob H. Apr 2025 #83
"The usual cancer of the Party are out here..."? lapucelle Apr 2025 #85
That was shameful and disgusting, wasn't it? Oopsie Daisy Apr 2025 #91
It was shameful and disgusting. lapucelle Apr 2025 #93
It is definitely MAGA level discourse. For shame. tritsofme Apr 2025 #94
Gee MorbidButterflyTat Apr 2025 #76
Little early for grave dancing. marble falls Apr 2025 #78
We can't afford this kind of bullshit orangecrush Apr 2025 #87
Perhaps Jared Golden can take his place. DJ Synikus Makisimus Apr 2025 #102
The big decision that could shape AOC's future AZProgressive Apr 2025 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»75-Year-Old Democrat Who ...»Reply #108