Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(50,700 posts)
19. This is a false claim OP. Fake news.
Sun May 11, 2025, 03:08 AM
May 11
Fact Check: Trump’s birthright citizenship ban will not affect his children

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/trumps-birthright-citizenship-ban-will-not-affect-his-children-2024-12-19/

All five of President-elect Donald Trump’s children fulfill two criteria for automatic U.S. citizenship - they were born to at least one U.S.-citizen parent and they were born in the United States - so they would not lose citizenship, as social media posts suggest, if Trump does away with so-called birthright citizenship, as he has promised to do.

Alongside pictures of four of Trump’s five children - Barron, Don Jr., Ivanka and Eric - posts on social media say, opens new tab: “Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship would mean 4 of his children wouldn't be considered U.S. citizens: Don Jr - born in 1977. Ivanka - born in 1981. Eric - born in 1984. Ivana - became a U.S. citizen in 1988. Barron - born in March 2006. Melania - became a U.S. citizen in July 2006.”

Trump, who ran his presidential campaign on border reform and mass deportations, is expected to roll out his immigration agenda and deport record numbers of illegal immigrants when he takes office on Jan. 20.

The social media posts followed an interview on Dec. 8 with NBC News' “Meet the Press with Kristen Welker,” in which Trump said he would take executive action to end birthright citizenship, which grants citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. regardless of the status of their parents.

snip


Here is the actual EO:

PROTECTING THE MEANING AND VALUE OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP

The White House

January 20, 2025

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/protecting-the-meaning-and-value-of-american-citizenship/

snip

Sec. 2. Policy. (a) It is the policy of the United States that no department or agency of the United States government shall issue documents recognizing United States citizenship, or accept documents issued by State, local, or other governments or authorities purporting to recognize United States citizenship, to persons: (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States was lawful but temporary, and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.

(b) Subsection (a) of this section shall apply only to persons who are born within the United States after 30 days from the date of this order.

(c) Nothing in this order shall be construed to affect the entitlement of other individuals, including children of lawful permanent residents, to obtain documentation of their United States citizenship.

Sec. 3. Enforcement. (a) The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Commissioner of Social Security shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that the regulations and policies of their respective departments and agencies are consistent with this order, and that no officers, employees, or agents of their respective departments and agencies act, or forbear from acting, in any manner inconsistent with this order.

(b) The heads of all executive departments and agencies shall issue public guidance within 30 days of the date of this order regarding this order’s implementation with respect to their operations and activities.

Sec. 4. Definitions. As used in this order:

(a) “Mother” means the immediate female biological progenitor.

(b) “Father” means the immediate male biological progenitor.

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

January 20, 2025.

Recommendations

8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles May 11 #1
He should get started ASAP. dchill May 11 #8
Wrong. See posts 17 and 19. OP should self-delete since jury members do not see posts 17 and 19. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 11 #25
My dad didn't become a US citizen until I was 19 years old. ShazzieB May 11 #13
This is a false claim OP. Fake news. Celerity May 11 #19
he can still FUCK HIMSELF Skittles May 11 #22
He's an alien, I know... wcmagumba May 11 #2
Wrong. See posts 17 and 19. If you think you know, you are believing a lie. Barron is a citizen. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 11 #24
Buh bye Barron NJCher May 11 #3
I disagree. Call me an elitist, wouldn't be the first time, Abolishinist May 11 #6
lol Cha May 11 #15
Good riddance weirdo. Klarkashton May 11 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed May 11 #7
If he had a shred of decency ... Tarzanrock May 11 #5
People say Slovenia is nice this time of year n the food is delish! sprinkleeninow May 11 #11
Damien n/t Cheezoholic May 11 #9
Hmm. Morbius May 11 #10
Exactly. That's what I thought. LittleGirl May 11 #12
You are safe. The EO is not retroactive. See posts 17 and 19. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 11 #27
Except the decree doesn't claim to be retroactive Ms. Toad May 11 #18
Wrong. The EO protects tRump because his father was a citizen and the EO is not retroactive. Same for Barron. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 11 #26
Fucking Sleaze Evil Hypocrites. Deport. Cha May 11 #14
Deport his ass! BidenRocks May 11 #16
You might want to do some fact checking before passing on memes. Ms. Toad May 11 #17
+1000 Celerity May 11 #21
False claim/fake news. You should sef-delete this. Celerity May 11 #20
If you want to protect DU's reputation and honour, self-delete this lie. Bernardo de La Paz May 11 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Bernardo de La Paz May 11 #28
Protect your own DU reputation and self-delete this post. If you do not know how to self-delete, ask. Bernardo de La Paz May 11 #29
Hey Barron if you offer your dad a big enough bribe, he might let you stay. Irish_Dem May 11 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #19