Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PJMcK

(24,616 posts)
35. And if you don't listen to Mother...
Mon May 19, 2025, 04:18 PM
May 2025

... expect the results.

It appears the ship may have had engine problems with the engine stuck in reverse. If sol they had no chance.

Have a great day, Buns.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great analysis. cachukis May 2025 #1
Thanks for your reply but there's something I learned after I posted PJMcK May 2025 #33
Sailed down from North Shore into East River in 70's. cachukis May 2025 #38
Thank you for the detailed description... 2naSalit May 2025 #2
That's super interesting stuff there Friend! Ligyron May 2025 #3
Thank you for this valuable information. Just looking at the image, I could niyad May 2025 #4
Bottom line is that the masts were simply too high to pass under the bridge. MineralMan May 2025 #5
It was supposed to head south IbogaProject May 2025 #12
Thanks for your reply, MM PJMcK May 2025 #26
Thanks for a knowledgeable, cogent analysis ms liberty May 2025 #6
Thanks for the analysis. I wondered why a ship that was obviously to tall for the bridge was going under it. patphil May 2025 #7
Thank you malaise May 2025 #8
Thanks for info, PJ. elleng May 2025 #9
The ship inexplicably lost power Ponietz May 2025 #10
The G.O.P. in charge of communications is proving itself incompetent beyond words BoRaGard May 2025 #18
Basic seamanship BeneteauBum May 2025 #11
Not quite accurate RoseTrellis May 2025 #13
Propulsion issue make sense. adnoid May 2025 #16
Thank you for this BumRushDaShow May 2025 #19
Interesting points PJMcK May 2025 #21
Navigation RoseTrellis May 2025 #43
A sextant! PJMcK May 2025 #47
Thanks for the very informative and interesting analysis. I've done a lot of sailing, so it meant a lot of sense to me. Martin68 May 2025 #14
The Pacific! PJMcK May 2025 #22
Thanks! The Pacific can be challenging, and requires a larger vessel in the huge rollers that distant storms generate. Martin68 May 2025 #48
One question is not answered in anything I read. did the ship send out an emergency signal once Wonder Why May 2025 #15
Good question PJMcK May 2025 #23
Yeah, that IS good question. calimary May 2025 #45
I remember when the Coast Guard training ship "Eagle" had a run-in with some inadvertently hung bridge safety netting. usonian May 2025 #17
I remember that episode PJMcK May 2025 #24
Thank you for this extremely educational post! colorado_ufo May 2025 #20
Your welcome! PJMcK May 2025 #25
A very clear explanation. Thanks. Norrrm May 2025 #27
You're welcome! PJMcK May 2025 #29
The East River is no joke to navigate. And this situation is so tragic. Scrivener7 May 2025 #28
I used to jog along the East River PJMcK May 2025 #30
We hit Hell Gate an hour later than planned once. Scrivener7 May 2025 #39
Mother Nature allows us to live on her planet. We follow her rules. nt Buns_of_Fire May 2025 #31
And if you don't listen to Mother... PJMcK May 2025 #35
Thanks for the information! viva la May 2025 #32
You are very kind with your response PJMcK May 2025 #34
I really appreciate your info viva la May 2025 #41
K&R spanone May 2025 #36
Having spent a few weeks crewing a much smaller tall ship over the years, Emrys May 2025 #37
Thank you for your rational and experiential explanation... Wounded Bear May 2025 #40
There is a yard at Sparrows Point , just east of Baltimore, that has . . . Stinky The Clown May 2025 #42
What I read last night was that the Rudder was Stuck electric_blue68 May 2025 #44
Thank you for your post. Have wondered about the technicalities of that tragic allegorical oracle May 2025 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Regarding the Mexican shi...»Reply #35