This Country IS Ready for a Woman President

[Botany]

2. Both Sec. Clinton and Vice President Harris "won" but the millions of under votes happened.

She Won, Part IV: And So Did Hillary. The Red Flags That Became Red Carpets.

We’ve already shared the astronomically improbable statistics from the 2024 election. We know Kamala Harris won. And the numbers you’re about to see are just as staggering. This isn’t about “unlikable candidates,” hacked emails, or mean tweets. It’s about the data.

Because when you strip away the noise and run the numbers—paired with fox-in-the-henhouse oversight—what emerges isn’t just suspicious. It’s mathematically impossible to ignore. And what we’re living through right now, both in the U.S. and around the world, was made possible by the silence after the 2016 election.

Snip

The 2016 election data reveals a widespread undervote anomaly that can’t be explained away by “unpopular candidates.” No, there’s a lot more to it than that. Historically, undervote percentages—representing ballots where voters skipped the presidential line—hovered around 0.5%. But in 2016, that number suddenly spiked to around 1.67%, more than tripling the norm.

The shift wasn’t limited to swing states—it hit across the board. Colorado jumped to 2.76%, California to 2.94%, Maine to 3.10%. Even red states like Indiana (2.59%) and Kansas (3.37%) showed dramatic increases. This wasn’t a natural shift in voter behavior. It was a statistical siren.

Snip

In unpacking the 2016 data, we found statistical improbabilities across all key states. But Michigan tells a different story. A race decided by just 10,704 votes recorded 75,335 undervotes in Detroit and Flint—most of which were disproportionately concentrated in Black, urban precincts where Hillary Clinton was expected to dominate.

Snip

The historical undervote norm is typically around 0.5%, but in Michigan that year it was a 14.4% undervote rate, odds of that occurring naturally are 1 in 10⁹⁸. That’s a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion octillions. Because the voting equipment just happened to “fail” in Black, urban precincts—and thanks to Michigan’s voting laws at the time, the recount was halted.

https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-part-iv-and-so-did-hillary