Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Justice Brandeis

(405 posts)
2. But vetoing it would have absolved him of the responsibility for its consequences
Sat Jul 26, 2025, 02:42 PM
Jul 2025

Much like Harry Truman vetoing the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947. It was overridden and became law, but he could wash his hands of it.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill Clinton is blamed fo...»Reply #2