Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ms. Toad

(38,824 posts)

3. It's not clear whose sign it was

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Mon Aug 18, 2025, 05:40 PM

Aug 2025

The first amendment first not give you the right to post signs on public (or someone else's) property. Just because you can say it doesn't mean you can take over someone else's property to say it.

That said, It would be up to the property owner, or real police, on public property, to remove it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Masked ICE agents remove D.C. protest sign [View all] red dog 1 Aug 2025 OP

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2025 #1

Fuck ICE, fuck ICE apologists, and fuck decorum in this time. WhiskeyGrinder Aug 2025 #2

Fuck you. hatrack Aug 2025 #4

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2025 #5

And they say irony is dead JoseBalow Aug 2025 #6

I fear they may not be long for this world. Xavier Breath Aug 2025 #8

Obvious troll is obvious. It won't be long JoseBalow Aug 2025 #10

Better make that dinner quick BannonsLiver Aug 2025 #7

It's not clear whose sign it was Ms. Toad Aug 2025 #3

Wouldn't ICE only have the right to remove it, if it was on their property? LeftInTX Aug 2025 #9

ICE is part of the federal government. Ms. Toad Aug 2025 #12

If found out the sign (via google lens) was placed on a DC public park: Lamont Park LeftInTX Aug 2025 #11