Does anyone else think the National Guardsmen in D.C. should be refusing illegal orders?

[Melon]

7. This is what they risk

“If a soldier refuses an order they believe to be unlawful, but it is later determined to be lawful, they face severe consequences, including court-martial, imprisonment, a bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of pay, and a negative impact on their career and reputation. While there are defenses for disobeying clearly unlawful orders, disobeying a lawful order is a serious military offense, and the burden is on the service member to demonstrate the order was unlawful. “

As far as I have heard it’s considered lawful. DC doesn’t have a governor, so the guard reports to the president. Unless a lawful ruling comes down stopping it, I think a troop would just lose everything. You can’t expect a soldier to take that action.