Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Massie names billionaire in Epstein's little black book [View all]
usedtobedemgurl
(2,069 posts)48. He did not implicate Paulsen
At least not in my mind. He never says Paulsen is a pedo. He says Paulsen MAY be implicated or embarrassed to be mentioned in the little black book. That, to me, is not accusing someone of what that person probably did.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As Massie said, it was already public. Good to say it though. The news is Massey actually said it. Apparently, at
mobeau69
Sep 2025
#5
Yeah, being in someone's contact list does not automatically make them a pedo.
usedtobedemgurl
Sep 2025
#51
Can't find a thing about Paulson that's controversial, except his bitter divorce battle after 21 yrs of marriage.
ancianita
Sep 2025
#16
They're not terrified because they're not elected and not trump and won't be charged by
ancianita
Sep 2025
#20
If one issue is going to completely destroy the billionaires and Trump, then yes.
SSJVegeta
Sep 2025
#29
We are dangerously and meticulously close to not ever having an election again
SSJVegeta
Sep 2025
#36
Massie is one of the few Congress people who will not accept AIPAC money
womanofthehills
Sep 2025
#83
John Paulson being on it was already known. Just not to the majority of the public until now.
Karasu
Sep 2025
#32
It doesn't mean that. What he says is just one name of all those others he COULD name.
ancianita
Sep 2025
#69
Does this just mean hist contact information was held by Epstein or does it link to sexual abuse?
Melon
Sep 2025
#37
I suspect a lot of men in corporate mass media board rooms are also in Epstein's Black Book.
sop
Sep 2025
#55
Follow the money. The men named in Epstein's various lists might or might not have been
Ocelot II
Sep 2025
#59
I don't think any of this is about prosecution, at this point, it's about outing pedophiles...
mucholderthandirt
Sep 2025
#73