Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

littlemissmartypants

(31,090 posts)
5. No face. No eyes to look back at him.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 09:46 AM
Sep 2025

Objectification. Which in any form should be at the very least objectionable.

In his case, deeply disturbing. In his case all people are reduced to his playthings.

We're all just objects in his imagination. He's completely void of empathetic human emotions.

He plays Army with the Armed Forces and the National Guard, like they're plastic toys. It's not hard to imagine what he does/has done with those he has had direct face-to-face power over and who are less equipped to resist.

It's all part of his psychopathic sickness.

We should all be terrified.

It's not a drawing of a nude woman. [View all] littlemissmartypants Sep 2025 OP
Not prepubescent female body. FalloutShelter Sep 2025 #1
Ultimate objectification of a person as thing to be used: no identity (head) no arms (resistance). Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2025 #3
The X-Files had an episode called "Home" that was about as chilling as that sick drawing. Texin Sep 2025 #17
I remember that episode! rhiannon55 Sep 2025 #37
I can't listen to Johnny Mathis without thinking of that episode. cloudbase Sep 10 #51
No legs to run away. Farmer-Rick Sep 10 #50
No face. No eyes to look back at him. littlemissmartypants Sep 2025 #5
Thank you for that observation. When I first saw this drawing, it allegorical oracle Sep 2025 #7
This was exactly my reaction too. Bluetus Sep 2025 #16
So true, but still republicans deny trump Mtnmama Sep 2025 #8
"He's not an artist." Hell no!!! calimary Sep 2025 #19
Rumor is they killed the boys they used. Blue Full Moon Sep 2025 #10
The lack of arms, legs and head was the first thing I noticed, BadgerMom Sep 2025 #15
Now that you brought up that chilling thought, who does own & have jurisdiction over that property? Hekate Sep 2025 #18
I have said from the start mercuryblues Sep 2025 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Mossfern Sep 2025 #27
True! yellow dahlia Sep 2025 #34
And as if that was not sufficiently perverted for Trump and his kind, there's that $22,000 RVN VET71 Sep 10 #47
THIS malaise Sep 2025 #2
Excellent point. OLDMDDEM Sep 2025 #4
Right on the mark!! bluestarone Sep 2025 #6
I thought the same when I first saw it, Silver Gaia Sep 2025 #9
Might possibly be the "secret" he referred to with Epstein. n/t dixiegrrrrl Sep 2025 #11
K&R. Wednesdays Sep 2025 #12
Yes I agree Sea A Chell Sep 2025 #13
Narrow shoulders - tick speak easy Sep 2025 #14
Correct misanthrope Sep 2025 #22
"public" hair? niyad Sep 2025 #40
My autocorrect does that TommyT139 Sep 2025 #42
Will keep that in mind. One is reminded, in the opposite direction, niyad Sep 2025 #43
MaddowBlog-Why the White House's unpersuasive pitch on the 'birthday book' seems so familiar LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #20
This is why ... littlemissmartypants Sep 2025 #21
Makes sense. Like the "fog of war," djt lives in a "fog of life." allegorical oracle Sep 2025 #25
Boxing Helena Pachamama Sep 2025 #24
What he drew was an abstraction that looks like a seamstress's dummy. LAS14 Sep 2025 #26
Hefty? What exactly does that mean? littlemissmartypants Sep 2025 #29
wide waist and hips LAS14 Sep 2025 #31
Girls can go through puberty pretty early ecstatic Sep 10 #53
I was talking about the drawing. nt LAS14 Sep 10 #55
My question as well Mossfern Sep 2025 #33
Keep trying. niyad Sep 10 #57
A sketch of a teenager EarthAbides Sep 2025 #28
When you think about how Jilly_in_VA Sep 2025 #30
I posted this last night. BidenRocks Sep 2025 #32
You have it right! yellow dahlia Sep 2025 #35
Somebody menttioned that before, when we first heard about this. niyad Sep 2025 #41
From Ghislaine, perhaps? yellow dahlia Sep 10 #54
Perhaps. He certainly did not come up with it on his own. Coded language? niyad Sep 10 #56
Right. yellow dahlia Sep 10 #58
Like when he learned "groceries" recently. niyad Sep 10 #60
Exactly! yellow dahlia Sep 10 #61
A very frightened one. niyad Sep 10 #62
Very clearly not. "Enigmas never age." Karasu Sep 2025 #36
It's just a sketch of a generic female form swong19104 Sep 2025 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author littlemissmartypants Sep 10 #45
Sorry, wrong thread. littlemissmartypants Sep 10 #46
Sorry, there is plenty to be read into that drawing. Why the dismissive tone? niyad Sep 10 #59
Because the dude swong19104 Sep 10 #64
You see what you see. Others see different things, being all-too- familiar niyad Sep 10 #65
And all I'm saying is swong19104 Sep 10 #66
Jeff Tiedrich said the same thing - it's a early teen GIRL! Grins Sep 2025 #39
Trump has just given every male MAGA voter who worries about his young daughter Aussie105 Sep 10 #44
Pretty sure those daughters need to be worrying about the fathers. niyad Sep 10 #63
Precisely orangecrush Sep 10 #48
We need to see DownriverDem Sep 10 #49
President Pubic Hair lapfog_1 Sep 10 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's not a drawing of a n...»Reply #5