Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheProle

(4,100 posts)
27. However abhorrent his rhetoric was,
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 05:29 PM
Sep 2025

unless he violated edge-cases of the First Amendment, he was exercising his right as an American to speak his mind.

Anyone applauding that is disgusting and ignorant.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Should we be calling this "political violence" when we don't know spooky3 Sep 2025 #1
No kidding leftstreet Sep 2025 #2
How is speaking out against violence "trying to get PR"? You want "thoughts and prayers"? live love laugh Sep 2025 #14
Kirk was shot while he was giving a political speech. yardwork Sep 2025 #4
Yes, but it could have been someone in his personal life that spooky3 Sep 2025 #5
I understand that but this isn't the time to second guess messages calling for non-violence. yardwork Sep 2025 #12
Violence is bad, period; that is what should be said. Nt spooky3 Sep 2025 #17
So do I and just psted as such. nt Cha Sep 2025 #11
A political figure was shot is that not the definition of political violence? live love laugh Sep 2025 #7
No, that implies that someone on the left shot him, and you spooky3 Sep 2025 #10
No implication whatsoever that somebody on the left shot him. yardwork Sep 2025 #16
Sorry, I don't agree. Bloomberg News was quite clear in spooky3 Sep 2025 #21
I do not interpret the phrase like you. It doesn't matter who live love laugh Sep 2025 #19
Ok , this will be my last comment. When Rand Paul's neighbor beat him up, spooky3 Sep 2025 #22
Objectively, a well known fascist was shot and killed but we don't know why he was shot yet. GoodRaisin Sep 2025 #31
Not a good time for the FBI to be in disarray. Sneederbunk Sep 2025 #3
Excellent statements.. Rjecting "Political Violence" Cha Sep 2025 #6
They blamed it on the Democrats...of course they did. sheshe2 Sep 2025 #15
Yeah, like I read the Traitors to the USA are Cha Sep 2025 #25
I 100% agree with you, Cha. sheshe2 Sep 2025 #28
Yes, and siad this.. the Gun Advocate that he WAS... Cha Sep 2025 #30
Shouldn't everybody wait before calling it politically motivated? awesomerwb1 Sep 2025 #8
That's the correct and appropriate response. sop Sep 2025 #9
Democrats were not the ones who divided America bucolic_frolic Sep 2025 #13
How do we know it was political? Maybe he raped someones pet goat. Autumn Sep 2025 #18
Good on them, it's what they should be saying IMHO AZJonnie Sep 2025 #20
Im sick of hearing america was founded on difference of opinions Samael13 Sep 2025 #23
However abhorrent his rhetoric was, TheProle Sep 2025 #27
He was within his 1st Samael13 Sep 2025 #29
Kamala Harris Shrek Sep 2025 #24
NOW DO MARGE TWO TOES Nimble_Idea Sep 2025 #26
Ari's panel agrees with you malaise Sep 2025 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author malaise Sep 2025 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Newsom and other prominen...»Reply #27