Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(130,887 posts)
2. Apart from the fact that he had been indicted and was about to stand trial for sex trafficking.
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 03:06 PM
Sep 2025

Looks like Trump's pet garden gnome is trying very, very hard to whitewash the Epstein files to be sure Dear Leader can't be associated with sex trafficking. If BFF Epstein didn't do it, then of course Trump can't have done it either.

What a lot of bullpucky.
Is he kidding? The checks must have cleared. RubyRose Sep 2025 #1
Apart from the fact that he had been indicted and was about to stand trial for sex trafficking. Ocelot II Sep 2025 #2
I feel the truth will eventually prevail vapor2 Sep 2025 #8
Wasn't he convicted, and EndlessWire Sep 2025 #28
He pled guilty in FL to 2 counts of engaging in prostitution with a minor. Ocelot II Sep 2025 #30
TY. EndlessWire Sep 2025 #32
Patel. Is. A. Liar. Bring. Him. Up. On. Charges. Trueblue1968 Sep 2025 #59
"Put his eyes out"????? returnee Sep 2025 #60
Someone should tell Patel about someone named Maxwell... RockRaven Sep 2025 #3
Yeah I mean, other than the convictions... underpants Sep 2025 #15
Spoke like a true G.O.P. Pedo Protector BoRaGard Sep 2025 #4
Isn't he a little young? fujiyamasan Sep 2025 #33
he is a Trump humper Skittles Sep 2025 #41
He wasn't important enough or rich enough to be on their list. rubbersole Sep 2025 #43
The kid with cookie crumbs on his mouth points to the family dog. Torchlight Sep 2025 #5
Hey, hey, hey ...there are standards here. rubbersole Sep 2025 #44
Says the goon who said he would not have an enemies list at his nomination vapor2 Sep 2025 #6
Shameless liar iemanja Sep 2025 #7
I'd Love to Hear His Definition of "Credible"! The Roux Comes First Sep 2025 #9
It means it's credible because they destroyed all the credible evidence. Clouds Passing Sep 2025 #35
You already know the jackass is lying. How about prince Andrew, and why won't they lostincalifornia Sep 2025 #10
You know what that means, don't you? Trump was really, really, really, really involved. Vinca Sep 2025 #11
Yes, indeed. Ocelot II Sep 2025 #13
In other words... regnaD kciN Sep 2025 #12
More likely popsdenver Sep 2025 #46
Isn't he busy investigating "Radical Leftist" organizations like the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the PTA? Ping Tung Sep 2025 #14
+ PBS, NPR, NOAA, Sierra Club, ASCPA, Food Network... rubbersole Sep 2025 #48
Just saying what has to be said to keep his job. no_hypocrisy Sep 2025 #16
Why were so many people going to his island? Was it that much of a vacation resort, seriously? everyonematters Sep 2025 #17
Follow the cash, Kash Jarqui Sep 2025 #18
Maybe this most extreme lie of all time will blow up the cover up. usonian Sep 2025 #19
I loved Burl Ives in that film,"Cat on a hot tin roof.". BattleRow Sep 2025 #40
Also Kash: the Utah killer had a manifesto, it was destroyed but we know there was one and what it said underpants Sep 2025 #20
The dog ate my manifesto. Midnight Writer Sep 2025 #22
(A bunch of kids) Really? Oh yeah, I TOTALLY saw it!! underpants Sep 2025 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author Midnight Writer Sep 2025 #21
If Epstein was not trafficking, why were there billions of dollars moving through his bank accounts? Midnight Writer Sep 2025 #23
Absolutely ridiculous lie. still-prayin4rain Sep 2025 #24
So he's completely ignoring the victim's testimony or Quiet Em Sep 2025 #25
Did he speak to the fucking victims Johonny Sep 2025 #26
Poisonous (r) BoRaGard Sep 2025 #27
Desperately try to change TACO's mind about shit canning him. This actually brings more attention on TACO. marble falls Sep 2025 #29
Well, if there was any doubt EndlessWire Sep 2025 #31
The federal indictment focuses on Epstein's abuse of his victims, but Ocelot II Sep 2025 #34
If that's true, that tells me, they distroyed a lot of evidence to protect Hair Leader. ... aggiesal Sep 2025 #36
Ask Bill Barr. rubbersole Sep 2025 #49
Credible is a weasel word Ponietz Sep 2025 #38
Aren't there a number of women who have come forward? What does "credible" mean in his head. twodogsbarking Sep 2025 #39
I suspect "credible" in his head means "said by a man" (nt) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2025 #53
Hey, Ca$h, why don't you release the files..... lastlib Sep 2025 #42
Kash has never seen any evidence that Epstein trafficked young women. tanyev Sep 2025 #45
I guess the testimony of the victims Mblaze Sep 2025 #47
LIAR xuplate Sep 2025 #50
Chris Wray and Kash Patel can't both be Sargent Shultz RANDYWILDMAN Sep 2025 #51
Attn Survivors: It's Time to Publish Your List! MrWowWow Sep 2025 #52
Then releasing everything shouldn't be an issue. nt Quixote1818 Sep 2025 #54
How can a coked up cross-eyed crony be trusted? Blue Owl Sep 2025 #55
So why did Trump's DOJ in 2019 indict him for Sex Trafficking? Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #56
THE FIX IS IN. spanone Sep 2025 #57
Since Epstein was his only customer for under age girls KS Toronado Sep 2025 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kash Patel Says No 'Credi...»Reply #2