Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The purported "transcript" of texts [View all]Wiz Imp
(10,556 posts)31. The following is not a great source but some interesting points made nonetheless
Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1968031696605053366%7Ctwgr%5Ed4762930d1b26c2c2e5b1314d926464cdffbb684%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsweek.com%2Ftyler-robinson-lance-twiggs-texts-charlie-kirk-2131025
IS UTAH TRYING TO LOSE THIS CASE?! - UT v Robinson
I just watched Utah Prosecutor Jeff Gray publicly read aloud private text messages, interviews, and alleged confessions during a press conference - BEFORE TRIAL - about UT v. Tyler Robinson (Charlie Kirk Shooting Case)
He even referred to them at the press conference as FACTS. Are you kidding me?
Oversharing inculpatory evidence like this is a HUGE constitutional no-no.
Even the slap on of a vague disclaimer like we want a fair trial, the damage is already done.
Also, the statements by Gray of "We will not be speaking to the press during the trial" AFTER READING ACTUAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE THAT HAS NOT BEEN VETTED BY THE COURT, is a lame and empty attempt to cover this massive violation of
= due process, 4th Amendment, 5th Amendment, etc
= the presumption of innocence,
= and the integrity of the entire case.
This is not just an error in strategy, this is potentially a legally destructive action.
We will see motions to:
Suppress tainted jury pools
Request sequestration or gag orders
Move for change of venue
Seek exclusion of evidence due to taint or even
Mistrial!
Ultimately, the defense may assert reversible error on appeal if the court fails to act
It is NOT a subject up to interpretation. There is long standing case law on this.
The Supreme Court in Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966) reversed Sheppards conviction, ruling 72 that he was denied a fair trial due to a failure to shield the proceedings from prejudicial media coverage.
Majority Opinion (Justice Clark):
The Court held that while freedom of the press is essential, it must not override a defendants right to a fair trial.
I just watched Utah Prosecutor Jeff Gray publicly read aloud private text messages, interviews, and alleged confessions during a press conference - BEFORE TRIAL - about UT v. Tyler Robinson (Charlie Kirk Shooting Case)
He even referred to them at the press conference as FACTS. Are you kidding me?
Oversharing inculpatory evidence like this is a HUGE constitutional no-no.
Even the slap on of a vague disclaimer like we want a fair trial, the damage is already done.
Also, the statements by Gray of "We will not be speaking to the press during the trial" AFTER READING ACTUAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE THAT HAS NOT BEEN VETTED BY THE COURT, is a lame and empty attempt to cover this massive violation of
= due process, 4th Amendment, 5th Amendment, etc
= the presumption of innocence,
= and the integrity of the entire case.
This is not just an error in strategy, this is potentially a legally destructive action.
We will see motions to:
Suppress tainted jury pools
Request sequestration or gag orders
Move for change of venue
Seek exclusion of evidence due to taint or even
Mistrial!
Ultimately, the defense may assert reversible error on appeal if the court fails to act
It is NOT a subject up to interpretation. There is long standing case law on this.
The Supreme Court in Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966) reversed Sheppards conviction, ruling 72 that he was denied a fair trial due to a failure to shield the proceedings from prejudicial media coverage.
Majority Opinion (Justice Clark):
The Court held that while freedom of the press is essential, it must not override a defendants right to a fair trial.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Don't see how who turned him in matters. Seems clear shooter's friend, pastor, maybe parents all helped him give up.
Silent Type
Sep 2025
#2
There is an extraordinarily low chance that the prosecutors would file false/tampered evidence with the charging docs.
Celerity
Sep 2025
#16
Colour me extremely sceptical that they would invent or rewrite these messages in this extraordinarily high profile case
Celerity
Sep 2025
#18
I too am skeptical, but I'm constantly amazed at the chutzpah (and stupidity) of this administration.
harumph
Sep 2025
#19
There is almost zero chance they would risk blowing the case by putting in fake and/or wilfully altered evidence,
Celerity
Sep 2025
#24
The following is not a great source but some interesting points made nonetheless
Wiz Imp
Sep 2025
#31
Team Trump want to publicize the relationship with a person who is trans to 1/ Show that Robinson was from the left
Doodley
Sep 2025
#30