Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My thought about Zohran Mamdani and the Democratic Party. [View all]SocialDemocrat61
(6,579 posts)65. Endorsements are bs
In 21 most of the few that happened didnt until late October. And the only major party figures were ones from NYC. Cuomo hasnt been establishment for years. Adams didnt run in the primary so its not fair to say he was establishment too. As far as the NYS chair not endorsing Mamdani, that is wrong. But thats only one person. And other than the endorsement has he taken any other action against the Mamdani campaign?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"We have a Democratic nominee. Are we a party who rallies behind our nominee or not?,"
Emile
Sep 29
#2
Unfortunately and some times it's wrong, but Democrats do have different opinions especially .......
Lovie777
Sep 29
#3
I am with you. Cuomo's term, like Bloomberg's had much that was awful in it, and much that
Scrivener7
Sep 29
#5
there is always the least bad choice . just be grateful for any vote he gets no matter how begrudging
msongs
Sep 29
#24
How about, if you can't, in good conscience, endorse the candidate, then don't say anything?
MIButterfly
Sep 29
#9
Cuomo was establishment Democrat until he declared himself himself IND after losing the Dem primary.
thesquanderer
Sep 29
#62
While they may not be withholding funds, I doubt the party machinery under Jacobs is working to elect him, either.
thesquanderer
Sep 29
#67
I still think he's part of the establishment since he didn't resign and disappear
Tribetime
Sep 30
#81
Populists use the label Establishment to identify and demonize imaginary corrupt enemies out to get them.
betsuni
Sep 30
#74
re: "a disgraced former governor who was forced to resign and is now running as an independent."
thesquanderer
Oct 12
#88
Good link, ty. But there is this perception that the big players in the party are not enthusaistic about him...
thesquanderer
Oct 12
#90
Gillibrand lives in N.Y. Booker does not. There is no reason for Booker to endorse candidates for another state.
3Hotdogs
Sep 29
#46
Conspiracy theory that Democrats are corrupted by donors, oligarchs, billionaires, corporations, lobbyists,
betsuni
Sep 30
#75
Then "new guard" gets same "disappointment" complaints, into the Status Quo Establishment binder they go.
betsuni
Sep 30
#79