Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hey Merrick Garland's Defenders, You Were Wrong [View all]gab13by13
(32,121 posts)75. Nothing specific was talked about,
No names were mentioned, the prosecutor only said the "possible charges" that could be made.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Careful, you will piss of Hunter, who was nothing but a divine asset during the term....
themaguffin
Nov 2025
#89
Biden expressed regret about hiring Garland, according to the Washington post
Blues Heron
Nov 2025
#18
Think Garland and Biden knew prosecutions would be chitshow and might help trump. Way it turned out too.
Silent Type
Nov 2025
#2
Garland was a disaster, but the real disaster was in 2016 by those who refused to vote for Hilllary and allowed trump
lostincalifornia
Nov 2025
#49
I disagree. First, the republicans made it clear they would not allow President Obama
lostincalifornia
Nov 2025
#103
I meant retiring prior to the 2014 midterms. Sorry for not making myself clear.
Crunchy Frog
Nov 2025
#104
So you admit that BIden was probably very pleased that Garlandtorpedoed the whole thing?
Bluetus
Nov 2025
#30
I felt that Biden didn't want to fire people or replace cabinet positions,
yellow dahlia
Nov 2025
#36
The problem was in 2016, and those who refused to vote for Hillary. Because of that trump appoint three supreme court
lostincalifornia
Nov 2025
#50
Garland was a party to the crime, complicit. Joe should never have put him in charge in any capacity.
Clouds Passing
Nov 2025
#16
Garland is besties with one of Trump's lawyers. IMHO, he deliberately threw the case. This could've been stopped.
AStern
Nov 2025
#23
That was a powerful statement - people have gotten court martialed for less.
yellow dahlia
Nov 2025
#38
If you want to open up "old wounds", it was 2016, and those who refused to vote for Hillary who determined what we have
lostincalifornia
Nov 2025
#46
It is called obcessive/compulsive disorder. Ignoring of course what happened in 2016 when Garland wasn't even on the
lostincalifornia
Nov 2025
#45
Also here's a link to an excerpt from the book given in today's MSNBC article
FakeNoose
Nov 2025
#73
Absolutely. Those three supreme court judges that trump appointed, along with judges such as canon, had nothing to do
lostincalifornia
Nov 2025
#52
Leonig is the most credible reporter that I ever listened to thank you for reporting this story.
msfiddlestix
Nov 2025
#76
If this just came out, Garland may still respond to it. I'll wait for that at least.
RoeVWade
Nov 2025
#84
Many wanted to give Garland time to do a proper job. He took the time and did not do a proper job. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2025
#83
Is there anything that explains Garland's action/inaction from his point of view?
ihaveaquestion
Nov 2025
#93