Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(12,627 posts)
6. I never embraced 40 year mortgages
Tue Nov 11, 2025, 03:52 PM
Nov 11

If the small reduction in payment makes such a difference, you cannot afford the house. Subjecting yourself to 10 or 20 years of additional payments and tens of thousands more in interest is a very, very bad deal in any book I know of.

Consider this:

A homeowner with a 30-year, 6.4% $400,000 mortgage owes $2,502 per month for a total cost of $900,729 over the life of the loan.

If that homeowner has Obamacare their health insurance will go up at least $800.


Trump's solution to affordability: Get that family a 50 year mortgage!!

With a 50-year loan at 6.4% our homeowner's payments would be $2,225 a month for a total cost of $1,334,877.


So, instead of paying $2,502 per month on a 30 year mortgage, they are paying $2,225.

Oh goody, they have a whooping $277 to put toward that $800 health insurance increase. And all this at a cost of a mere $434,148 and 20 additional years of payments.

Does he really think people will get all excited over the prospect of shoveling hundreds of thousands more dollars in the pockets of banks for the privilege of squeezing expenses down a couple hundred dollars -- dollars that won't even begin to offset the costs of health insurance, electricity (no more clean energy subsidies), groceries, and every other necessity?

On edit:
I am an old fogy, but my approach to taking on debt is that I put enough down to make the payment so manageable that I can make larger payments with regularity, and only have limit myself to regularly scheduled payments when some emergency or unexpected expense leaves me short.

If I can't put that much down, I need to downsize the purchase.

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who cares? n/t leftstreet Nov 11 #1
Very simple BeerBarrelPolka Nov 11 #2
50 year mortgages are like reverse mortgages. No one should use them unless absolutely necessary. But agree with post. Silent Type Nov 11 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 11 #4
Except sometimes folks have no choice. Silent Type Nov 11 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 11 #18
Yes,reverse M's tack on a lot of fees that eventually eat up all your equity, they are one of the worst bankster scams,. yaesu Nov 11 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 11 #11
Don't see any evidence majority of Dems embraced 40 yr mortgages uponit7771 Nov 11 #15
I never embraced 40 year mortgages pat_k Nov 11 #6
Is the mortgage schedule part and parcel of the Democratic platform? Torchlight Nov 11 #8
10 year difference. We don't have adequate renovation programs. The homes are too BIG. bucolic_frolic Nov 11 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 11 #10
I'm mainly just complaining about the bullshit self-aggrandizement of putting Trump on a sign with FDR AZJonnie Nov 11 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 11 #13
Link to majority Dems embracing 40 yr mortgages under Obama ...tia uponit7771 Nov 11 #14
We? demmiblue Nov 11 #16
40 year loans were not widely embraced under Obama. And Obama himself clearly did not embrace them. Wiz Imp Nov 11 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 11 #24
40 year mortgages were one element of a package of comprehensive reforms DBoon Nov 11 #26
Bullshit. Wiz Imp Nov 11 #29
The way we do it is to propose a national credit union that will make SIMPLE INTEREST home loans Volaris Nov 11 #19
40+ year mortgages are SMART in the right market conditions... WarGamer Nov 11 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 11 #21
Lower payments doesn't mean more affordable Happy Hoosier Nov 12 #36
It's a quesiton of affordability. So either fix wages or fix real property prices. flvegan Nov 11 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 11 #23
I have no problem with 40 or 50 yr mortgages ... PBC_Democrat Nov 11 #25
I hated the idea of a 40 yr mortgage then Sailingdiver Nov 11 #27
Yes, a 50 year mortgage and the amount of interest paid over that period is insane. CentralMass Nov 11 #28
You left out some critical facts: spooky3 Nov 11 #30
I didn't know that I or we embraced 40 year loans Renew Deal Nov 11 #31
The average voter doesn't know either newdeal2 Nov 12 #35
But is there a universal problem or solution JT45242 Nov 11 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 11 #34
Take a good look at the graph you reference in your OP. Totally Tunsie Nov 11 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #6