Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cmmngrnd

(30 posts)
8. There was no 31k vote "jump" and nobody is calling for a recount
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 08:08 PM
12 hrs ago

The 31,000 vote jump was claimed by This Will Hold (TWH) and Decision Desk Headquarters (DDHQ) but they never put forth any evidence that it happened, or any explanation of why they claim it happened. Every graphic shown on their sites show vote totals contradicting their claim - no 31,000 vote jump.

Now these people are repeating the unverified 31k vote claim - still with no evidence - and claiming un-named election advocates are demanding a recount. If somebody was demanding a recount they would be named. It would be Marc Elias or the Tennessee Democratic party or some other named organization. By the way, whoever demands a recount in a race this far apart has to pay for it.

Whenever anybody says "they" are doing something without naming them, be suspicious. And use the same logic we use when Republicans claim antifa is a real organization -- they say it but can't name a single actual organization.

If somebody shows an actual jump of 31k votes (meaning documentation that at some point 94.6% of the vote was counted and the 100% vote was 31k higher) and names an actual organization that is on record as having filed for a recount I'll happily concede the point.

More detailed discussion in this thread.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1% of precincts could be 31,000 votes. A precinct isnt defined by number of people or % of votes SSJVegeta 13 hrs ago #1
It would be nearly impossible for 0.6% of the precincts in the District Wiz Imp 13 hrs ago #4
Those are still averages though. We are talking about a county with both a large rural and urban population SSJVegeta 12 hrs ago #5
Update: it would be absolutely impossible for 0.6% of the precincts Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #6
(Post deleted due to being off a factor of 10) SSJVegeta 12 hrs ago #7
This message was self-deleted by its author padfun 12 hrs ago #10
0.6percent of 230 is 1.38 not 13. Something isn't mathing. mackdaddy 11 hrs ago #13
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 11 hrs ago #14
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 11 hrs ago #16
So the claim is that DDHQ reported 99.4% reporting SSJVegeta 11 hrs ago #17
My experience was voters Deminpenn 11 hrs ago #21
That would have been my guess, but I'm pretty sure I read Wiz Imp 10 hrs ago #25
Scrap that. I see now this was brought forth by Thhis Will Hold Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #32
K&R spanone 13 hrs ago #2
You don't get hand recounts in a nine point loss FBaggins 13 hrs ago #3
There was no 31k vote "jump" and nobody is calling for a recount cmmngrnd 12 hrs ago #8
I'm afraid it will become the norm to claim "We was Robbed," every time someone loses "on both sides." Silent Type 11 hrs ago #12
which the Trump maggot Republicans 'normalized' ! Jack Valentino 10 hrs ago #26
Exactly, but we ain't got to do it too. Silent Type 10 hrs ago #27
Yeah, that last poll that showed the race within two points Jack Valentino 10 hrs ago #28
That is true. I'd applaud the changes, but not in a sure loser like this one unless some honest to gawd bombshell Silent Type 10 hrs ago #29
I love your post. sheshe2 9 hrs ago #31
That's it iemanja 8 hrs ago #34
Post removed Post removed 11 hrs ago #19
It would be easy to prove the election advocates wrong. Chemical Bill 12 hrs ago #9
Recounts very rarely change the outcome by 0.5% iemanja 11 hrs ago #15
I think cheating by Republicans... Chemical Bill 11 hrs ago #18
I can tell you my recollection iemanja 11 hrs ago #22
My recollection is... Chemical Bill 10 hrs ago #24
It's about Jill Stein in the sense she collected money iemanja 8 hrs ago #33
You said Jill Stein kept the money... Chemical Bill 7 hrs ago #35
This is what Trump and his supremacist, KPN 12 hrs ago #11
Recommended. H2O Man 11 hrs ago #20
Let them pay for it Jose Garcia 10 hrs ago #23
Same grifters Boo1 9 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Election Advoca...»Reply #8