Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chemical Bill

(3,010 posts)
18. I think cheating by Republicans...
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 09:30 PM
21 hrs ago

discourages people from voting. I don't care if it doesn't change the outcome this time, I care if it changes the outcome next November.

I first saw this information in an email from Election Truth Alliance. If you want more information about who "election advocates" are, you might start there.

Jill Stein didn't prevent the recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania in 2016. Republicans did. The fact that recounts were not done does not support your arguments. Do you have a source for your information that Jill Stein kept the money?

Republicans stopped the recount in Miami Dade County in 2000. The recount done by the media consortium found that Gore won every statewide recount scenario. Yes, I believe your assertion that recounts rarely change the outcome by 0.5%. Do you not believe that Republicans cheat, and recounts might find more cheating than we can prove without recounts?

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1% of precincts could be 31,000 votes. A precinct isnt defined by number of people or % of votes SSJVegeta Yesterday #1
It would be nearly impossible for 0.6% of the precincts in the District Wiz Imp 23 hrs ago #4
Those are still averages though. We are talking about a county with both a large rural and urban population SSJVegeta 23 hrs ago #5
Update: it would be absolutely impossible for 0.6% of the precincts Wiz Imp 23 hrs ago #6
(Post deleted due to being off a factor of 10) SSJVegeta 23 hrs ago #7
This message was self-deleted by its author padfun 22 hrs ago #10
0.6percent of 230 is 1.38 not 13. Something isn't mathing. mackdaddy 22 hrs ago #13
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 22 hrs ago #14
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 22 hrs ago #16
So the claim is that DDHQ reported 99.4% reporting SSJVegeta 21 hrs ago #17
My experience was voters Deminpenn 21 hrs ago #21
That would have been my guess, but I'm pretty sure I read Wiz Imp 21 hrs ago #25
Scrap that. I see now this was brought forth by Thhis Will Hold Wiz Imp 20 hrs ago #32
K&R spanone Yesterday #2
You don't get hand recounts in a nine point loss FBaggins 23 hrs ago #3
There was no 31k vote "jump" and nobody is calling for a recount cmmngrnd 23 hrs ago #8
I'm afraid it will become the norm to claim "We was Robbed," every time someone loses "on both sides." Silent Type 22 hrs ago #12
which the Trump maggot Republicans 'normalized' ! Jack Valentino 21 hrs ago #26
Exactly, but we ain't got to do it too. Silent Type 20 hrs ago #27
Yeah, that last poll that showed the race within two points Jack Valentino 20 hrs ago #28
That is true. I'd applaud the changes, but not in a sure loser like this one unless some honest to gawd bombshell Silent Type 20 hrs ago #29
I love your post. sheshe2 20 hrs ago #31
That's it iemanja 18 hrs ago #34
Post removed Post removed 21 hrs ago #19
It would be easy to prove the election advocates wrong. Chemical Bill 22 hrs ago #9
Recounts very rarely change the outcome by 0.5% iemanja 22 hrs ago #15
I think cheating by Republicans... Chemical Bill 21 hrs ago #18
I can tell you my recollection iemanja 21 hrs ago #22
My recollection is... Chemical Bill 21 hrs ago #24
It's about Jill Stein in the sense she collected money iemanja 18 hrs ago #33
You said Jill Stein kept the money... Chemical Bill 17 hrs ago #35
This is what Trump and his supremacist, KPN 22 hrs ago #11
Recommended. H2O Man 21 hrs ago #20
Let them pay for it Jose Garcia 21 hrs ago #23
Same grifters Boo1 20 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Election Advoca...»Reply #18