Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chemical Bill

(3,010 posts)
24. My recollection is...
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 09:58 PM
7 hrs ago

That the states took payments before starting the recounts. Then the GOP sued to stop recounts, were successful, and the states didn't give refunds. Interestingly, search engines don't give results from left wing media, so it's hard to source this.

But I found this:
2016 United States presidential election recounts - Wikipedia https://share.google/USm1P0fGFEM5faoU1

But this isn't about Jill Stein. This is about Republican cheating. I want to stop the gerrymandering, the purges, the bomb scares coming from Russia, the lack of voting machines in Democratic areas, and yes, the machine counts that are not verified by hand counts. Have you read Was The 2004 Presidential Election Stolen, by Freeman? You might want to.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1% of precincts could be 31,000 votes. A precinct isnt defined by number of people or % of votes SSJVegeta 11 hrs ago #1
It would be nearly impossible for 0.6% of the precincts in the District Wiz Imp 10 hrs ago #4
Those are still averages though. We are talking about a county with both a large rural and urban population SSJVegeta 10 hrs ago #5
Update: it would be absolutely impossible for 0.6% of the precincts Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #6
(Post deleted due to being off a factor of 10) SSJVegeta 9 hrs ago #7
This message was self-deleted by its author padfun 9 hrs ago #10
0.6percent of 230 is 1.38 not 13. Something isn't mathing. mackdaddy 9 hrs ago #13
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 8 hrs ago #14
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 8 hrs ago #16
So the claim is that DDHQ reported 99.4% reporting SSJVegeta 8 hrs ago #17
My experience was voters Deminpenn 8 hrs ago #21
That would have been my guess, but I'm pretty sure I read Wiz Imp 7 hrs ago #25
Scrap that. I see now this was brought forth by Thhis Will Hold Wiz Imp 6 hrs ago #32
K&R spanone 11 hrs ago #2
You don't get hand recounts in a nine point loss FBaggins 10 hrs ago #3
There was no 31k vote "jump" and nobody is calling for a recount cmmngrnd 9 hrs ago #8
I'm afraid it will become the norm to claim "We was Robbed," every time someone loses "on both sides." Silent Type 9 hrs ago #12
which the Trump maggot Republicans 'normalized' ! Jack Valentino 7 hrs ago #26
Exactly, but we ain't got to do it too. Silent Type 7 hrs ago #27
Yeah, that last poll that showed the race within two points Jack Valentino 7 hrs ago #28
That is true. I'd applaud the changes, but not in a sure loser like this one unless some honest to gawd bombshell Silent Type 7 hrs ago #29
I love your post. sheshe2 7 hrs ago #31
That's it iemanja 5 hrs ago #34
Post removed Post removed 8 hrs ago #19
It would be easy to prove the election advocates wrong. Chemical Bill 9 hrs ago #9
Recounts very rarely change the outcome by 0.5% iemanja 8 hrs ago #15
I think cheating by Republicans... Chemical Bill 8 hrs ago #18
I can tell you my recollection iemanja 8 hrs ago #22
My recollection is... Chemical Bill 7 hrs ago #24
It's about Jill Stein in the sense she collected money iemanja 5 hrs ago #33
You said Jill Stein kept the money... Chemical Bill 4 hrs ago #35
This is what Trump and his supremacist, KPN 9 hrs ago #11
Recommended. H2O Man 8 hrs ago #20
Let them pay for it Jose Garcia 7 hrs ago #23
Same grifters Boo1 7 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Election Advoca...»Reply #24