Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Boo1

(98 posts)

30. Same grifters

Reply to sheshe2 (Original post)

Thu Dec 4, 2025, 10:45 PM

1 hr ago

that are always claiming they have proof that Kamala won 2024.

No better than Cyber Ninjas.

Even if everything they said was true. Do you really think it's evidence of a grand conspiracy to rig the election, or that Decision Desk had a bug in their precinct count?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: Election Advocates Demand Recount in Tennessee [View all] sheshe2 5 hrs ago OP

1% of precincts could be 31,000 votes. A precinct isnt defined by number of people or % of votes SSJVegeta 5 hrs ago #1

It would be nearly impossible for 0.6% of the precincts in the District Wiz Imp 4 hrs ago #4

Those are still averages though. We are talking about a county with both a large rural and urban population SSJVegeta 4 hrs ago #5

Update: it would be absolutely impossible for 0.6% of the precincts Wiz Imp 4 hrs ago #6

(Post deleted due to being off a factor of 10) SSJVegeta 3 hrs ago #7

This message was self-deleted by its author padfun 3 hrs ago #10

0.6percent of 230 is 1.38 not 13. Something isn't mathing. mackdaddy 3 hrs ago #13

This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 3 hrs ago #14

This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 2 hrs ago #16

So the claim is that DDHQ reported 99.4% reporting SSJVegeta 2 hrs ago #17

My experience was voters Deminpenn 2 hrs ago #21

That would have been my guess, but I'm pretty sure I read Wiz Imp 1 hr ago #25

Scrap that. I see now this was brought forth by Thhis Will Hold Wiz Imp 52 min ago #32

K&R spanone 5 hrs ago #2

You don't get hand recounts in a nine point loss FBaggins 4 hrs ago #3

There was no 31k vote "jump" and nobody is calling for a recount cmmngrnd 3 hrs ago #8

I'm afraid it will become the norm to claim "We was Robbed," every time someone loses "on both sides." Silent Type 3 hrs ago #12

which the Trump maggot Republicans 'normalized' ! Jack Valentino 1 hr ago #26

Exactly, but we ain't got to do it too. Silent Type 1 hr ago #27

Yeah, that last poll that showed the race within two points Jack Valentino 1 hr ago #28

That is true. I'd applaud the changes, but not in a sure loser like this one unless some honest to gawd bombshell Silent Type 1 hr ago #29

I love your post. sheshe2 1 hr ago #31

Post removed Post removed 2 hrs ago #19

It would be easy to prove the election advocates wrong. Chemical Bill 3 hrs ago #9

Recounts very rarely change the outcome by 0.5% iemanja 3 hrs ago #15

I think cheating by Republicans... Chemical Bill 2 hrs ago #18

I can tell you my recollection iemanja 2 hrs ago #22

My recollection is... Chemical Bill 2 hrs ago #24

This is what Trump and his supremacist, KPN 3 hrs ago #11

Recommended. H2O Man 2 hrs ago #20

Let them pay for it Jose Garcia 2 hrs ago #23

Same grifters Boo1 1 hr ago #30