Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MSM: "AOC is just a left wing kook we can't take seriously, while [View all]reACTIONary
(7,434 posts)73. In my opinion, editorial comments....
... should be based in factual reality and provide some evidence of that reality.
As an example of the characterization of AOC that I see in the main stream media, here is a WaPo article about her from right after she was elected. It characterizes her, and also explores why "the main stream media" struggles to characterize her. No paywall, but you might have to register your email.
Why the media world cant make sense of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: The congressional newcomer doesnt fit neatly into a preexisting mold.
This article makes so many good points that it is hard to select from them and keep within the four paragraph quote limit. Here is a sample:
In the moments after President Trumps televised address to the nation last week a barely disguised campaign pitch promoting his border wall his Democratic opponents response was stilted and tepid. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), in the felicitous phrasing of James Poniewozik of the New York Times, were looking unfortunately like a cross between Grant Woods American Gothic and the twins from The Shining.
Whatever it was that was needed in that crucial moment, they lacked: Spunk. Passion. Vitality. A few minutes later, Ocasio-Cortez made her first appearance with Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, and exhibited precisely those qualities. She practically jumped off the screen into the nations living rooms.
Whatever it was that was needed in that crucial moment, they lacked: Spunk. Passion. Vitality. A few minutes later, Ocasio-Cortez made her first appearance with Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, and exhibited precisely those qualities. She practically jumped off the screen into the nations living rooms.
Here is another example covering her personal account of her experiences during the Jan 6 insurrection:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shared her personal story and revealed our collective trauma.
In many ways, the setting was stark and sterile, but she filled all that emptiness with her clear-eyed recollections of fear and dismay. She might have been using 21st-century technology, but her storytelling style was one that goes back generations. This was our shared oral history a full reenactment.
She began at the end and then she circled back to the beginning as a dramatist might. She recalled seeing the warning signs of what was to come of encountering demonstrators earlier that week when she left the Capitol after a vote and headed for her car. Her heart was pounding when she saw their Trump signs attached to their sharp flagpoles, but she still engaged with them. I like to think Im disarming, she said as she laughed.
She began at the end and then she circled back to the beginning as a dramatist might. She recalled seeing the warning signs of what was to come of encountering demonstrators earlier that week when she left the Capitol after a vote and headed for her car. Her heart was pounding when she saw their Trump signs attached to their sharp flagpoles, but she still engaged with them. I like to think Im disarming, she said as she laughed.
I read, and support, the "main stream media." What I see is factual and respectful reporting concerning AOC.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree. I wasn't predisposed to approve of her, but she has really shown me.
Mister Ed
Dec 2025
#36
Tap the brakes...AOC is the future for Democratic Socialists and the Bernie supporters, NOT the Democratic Party
Wanderlust988
Dec 2025
#50
It's not for South Carolina to decide, and it doesn't have to be the presidency
MadameButterfly
Dec 2025
#59
It was South Carolina that saved our ass in 2020 with Joe Biden, and he is progressive
Wanderlust988
Dec 2025
#65
I don't want a flame thrower and I object that you decide who is a dreamer or not
MadameButterfly
Dec 2025
#70
AOC has and is putting in the work while Ms Kirk is being anointed by the press...big difference
Deuxcents
Dec 2025
#6
I could see FoxNews and maybe CNN. May NYTimes and WaPo but not sure who else
LymphocyteLover
Dec 2025
#25
Regarless of whether you think she's a kook or not, she's not an opportunistic grifter
ToxMarz
Dec 2025
#17
When I said "Regarless of whether you think she's a kook" I wasn't referring to the original poster
ToxMarz
Dec 2025
#46
OP wasn't saying AOC's a kook. Quite the opposite. OP was referencing her unfair and biased treatment by M$M vs Kirk n/t
Cheezoholic
Dec 2025
#28
When I said "Regarless of whether you think she's a kook" I wasn't referring to the original poster
ToxMarz
Dec 2025
#44
You have a long wait because there is none. The OP just trolled it out of thin air.
ificandream
Dec 2025
#34
It seems clear to me that it's describing the general gist of what the MSM is saying, rather than quoting anyone.
Scrivener7
Dec 2025
#38
And apparently, general statements really piss them off. Which is ... very strange.
Scrivener7
Dec 2025
#45
CBS is clearly throwing down the rose petals for Kirk. That's pretty mainstream.
Scrivener7
Dec 2025
#39
Thanks. I forgot how CBS has gone down the toilet since the Weiss takeover
LymphocyteLover
Dec 2025
#66
OP is NOT implying Kirk is wonderful. The OP is about the unfair treatment AOC gets in the M$M compared to Kirk
Cheezoholic
Dec 2025
#29
I don't need an interpretation. I get what he made it look like he was saying.
ificandream
Dec 2025
#32