Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(8,779 posts)
10. You must have missed this part of the document you linked to
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 01:13 PM
2 hrs ago
The claim of sexual abuse must be directed against Epstein.


The claims for this fund would not be against anyone other than Epstein. The claims were thoroughly investigated. Why you're so sure many of them are false tells more about you than anythng. No note of caution is needed.

There have been no public reports of widespread false claims successfully made against the program. The VCP administrator handled claims confidentially and reported potentially fraudulent activity to law enforcement. (and that would also be included in the files). The criticisms against the fund were primarily that they were protecting Epstein's Estate and denying legitimate claims.

The story about the 13 year old, and baby murder had absolutely nothing to do with this fund. That was reported to an FBI tip-line. Until you can identify a single claim from the files which supports your OP, I will consider your post an unjustified smear against the actual victims.

At this point, few people will be concered about false claims against Epstein. His crimes against humanity are well documented already. What people want to get out of the files is who else was complicit but not yet held accountable.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A note of caution on Epst...»Reply #10