Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jonstl08

(533 posts)
37. Not a good idea
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 12:39 PM
3 hrs ago

I know this is a minority opinion in this thread but I think this is the wrong approach. They should at the federal level go after the tax avoidance schemes these billionaire use as tax shelters such as taking out loans on their assets such as stocks. Then using the dividends (if qualified) received to pay off the loans. You pay a lower rate of tax on qualified dividends plus the interest on the loans may be tax deductible.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Don't let the door slap you on the ass on your way out, parasites. Ocelot II 5 hrs ago #1
You beat me to it SheltieLover 3 hrs ago #27
I guess that will open housing for people who pay taxes. NT Gore1FL 5 hrs ago #2
Newsom's response should be: CousinIT 5 hrs ago #3
Newsom dweller 5 hrs ago #8
Ugh karin_sj 4 hrs ago #23
Ugh. CousinIT 3 hrs ago #26
Better get the nose clips ready. BannonsLiver 3 hrs ago #30
They would have to move in the next day to avoid the retroactive tax? newdeal2 5 hrs ago #4
The BILLIONAIRE Class have become the WHINER class. ProudMNDemocrat 5 hrs ago #5
It is called greed Stargazer99 5 hrs ago #6
I think they should whine louder and more publicly EYESORE 9001 4 hrs ago #20
They always have been Johonny 4 hrs ago #22
Make it a National Law, save SS Law. multigraincracker 5 hrs ago #7
Yes! SheltieLover 3 hrs ago #28
"So, what's the bad news?" nt Buns_of_Fire 5 hrs ago #9
Good Riddance! NT Daigan 5 hrs ago #10
I honestly think a majority would gladly have the Kardashians (and of course, Musk) depart California... hlthe2b 4 hrs ago #11
Contribute to the common good or goodbye. C_U_L8R 4 hrs ago #12
Money hoarders UpInArms 4 hrs ago #13
"Sometimes the coppice needs to be cleared lest it becomes a hedgerow." Hugin 4 hrs ago #14
Hey MAGA, it's not the immigrants who are ruining America! It's the billionaires! Initech 4 hrs ago #15
Bye.. .... Lovie777 4 hrs ago #16
The state of California's economists have projected that this tax would result in a net loss of revenue Jose Garcia 4 hrs ago #17
Link? nt drmeow 3 hrs ago #32
New York Times: Jose Garcia 3 hrs ago #34
I keep hearing that they don't pay any taxes anyway MichMan 2 hrs ago #43
Feels like a poison pill measure designed to get GOP Johonny 4 hrs ago #18
It could probably get renewed every 5 years MichMan 3 hrs ago #38
They are his peeps though Blue Full Moon 4 hrs ago #19
Good riddance, assholes! karin_sj 4 hrs ago #21
California will be better without them. spanone 4 hrs ago #24
Are you sure about that? pcdb 1 hr ago #48
They won't leave. intheflow 4 hrs ago #25
As long as they take Zuckerberg with them Retrograde 3 hrs ago #29
Wealth Taxes should be at the Federal level not State level walkingman 3 hrs ago #31
Spiro is a F'ing con man. haele 3 hrs ago #33
Spiro is a scumbag Hassin Bin Sober 2 hrs ago #46
Silly billionaires. hunter 3 hrs ago #35
California will be better off when these leeches leave. bluestarone 3 hrs ago #36
Not a good idea jonstl08 3 hrs ago #37
Of course they will? OC375 3 hrs ago #39
50 million dollars one time kwolf68 2 hrs ago #40
So California will lose the tax money of people who don't pay taxes? LostOne4Ever 2 hrs ago #41
Massachusetts was warned that the wealthy would flee if a wealth tax was instituted. TheRickles 2 hrs ago #42
How will the government determine how much they owe? MichMan 2 hrs ago #44
The low cost of living has never been a reason to live in California. Buddyzbuddy 2 hrs ago #45
I hope they don't come to my state. BoomaofBandM 2 hrs ago #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gavin Newsom warned that ...»Reply #37