Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dan

(5,009 posts)
27. I was listening to a pod-caster video
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 02:54 PM
Sunday

He made some interesting points - which I hope will not be perceived as an attack on Democrats, but what he said resonated with me.

The primary point he made that the GOP is slowly but surely stripping rights away from the working class, via policy, misinformation, combined with racism and misogyny. Once they strip some rights away, the Democratic party resumes power and slowly but surely reacquires some of the rights that have been stripped away. Some, but not all. So, gradually the nation is trending rightward.

The problem is that both parties are somewhat beholden to their donors - and they share the some of the same donors. That is one of the primary reason we don't have universal health care. The Healthcare lobby has more power than we the people combined with the additional power that Citizens United bestowed on Corporations.

This Pod-caster advocated for a third party that would benefit the workers Or a real Democratic party leadership that would actively fight for the working class without regard for the donor base. People like Congressperson Crockett, AOC, etc., those that are leading the charge and have media savvy to counteract the right-wing media.

It was interesting because I have a friend that is currently trying to form a third party for some of the same reasons that this pod-caster made. While very progressive he has turned off the Democratic party due to what he perceives as their half-ass measures to address the needs of the working person. And, unfortunately he believes that our party is more interested in their fund raising over the people. He believes that the old people in the party are more interested in their seats (and will do nothing that jeopardizes the seats) than benefiting the people.

On parts I do have to agree - I think that the party would be better served by pushing more of the younger generation of Democratic leaders than catering to the needs/beliefs of the elderly members of the party. I do believe that change is in the air and that the younger people are going to lead our party in changing and finding news ways. The young people will fight while the elders seek compromise (with the exception of Nancy P., who I hope will live forever as a demonstrator of a fighter). I do question whether compromise is the way forward given what we are currently experiencing and the character of the GOP.

Like I said, I hope that this won't be perceived as an attack on the Democratic party but maybe something to think about as we go forward.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why can't Democrats just say it: [View all] Chasstev365 Sunday OP
They can do that. Just saying the GOP is standing in the way of better healthcare, affordability & stability works too. dutch777 Sunday #1
There is so much low hanging fruit that we are not picking. The messaging Scrivener7 Sunday #2
I stand boggled with you, S7. yellow dahlia Sunday #39
Maybe they'll suggest Republicans wear body cams n/t leftstreet Sunday #3
Jason Crow said it, gab13by13 Sunday #4
I don't think we can wait that long. Jan 2027 if a new Congress is seated. paleotn Sunday #12
That Alaska airborn unit's planned deployment to Minnesota is not actually for Minnesota. Scrivener7 Monday #56
Again, we are waiting on something that may not happen. hamsterjill Sunday #20
Post removed Post removed Monday #44
I believe taking a stand now and fighting them Hey Joe Monday #51
No, NO!! We must focus on the Abundance Agenda, because that's what our consultants said!!! hatrack Sunday #5
I guess Hakeem Jefferies, Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, AOC, et al. didn't get the memo? paleotn Sunday #11
Also Jamie Raskin, Eric Swalwell, and many others ShazzieB Sunday #25
I get tired of that particular Dem bashing line too BaronChocula Sunday #37
Evidently one can be a "supporter" giving "constructive criticism" by lying about what Democrats do/say and do not. betsuni Monday #54
You mean the Elissa Slotkin choie Monday #52
We do Democrats always have to present a positive message and agenda that the corporate media ignores? Chasstev365 Sunday #16
Fire all the consultants. yellow dahlia Sunday #40
I'm a Democrat and I'm saying, as are you too, I assume. Some elected Dems are saying it too-- like Jasmine Crockett! LymphocyteLover Sunday #6
Sometimes Katcat Sunday #7
Really no downside to much these days. paleotn Sunday #8
Coloring within the lines for decorum's sake only guarantees Democrats march in an orderly fashion to the camps. Efilroft Sul Sunday #9
We say that all the time creeksneakers2 Sunday #10
Schumer: "The bottom line is, Senate Republicans continually fall in line behind Donald Trump, no matter how reckless, betsuni Sunday #13
You can be a supporter choie Monday #53
Why don't Democrats use some random phrasing that came out of your head? Gee, I don't know? tritsofme Sunday #14
Reread my original post: You missed my point entirely Chasstev365 Sunday #17
It's just not true. Democrats denounce Republicans for falling behind Trump all the time. tritsofme Sunday #19
Yes, it's not true. Gaslights make it pretty dim in here. betsuni Sunday #30
Yes - the problem with the Republican party is REPUBLICANS, not just Trump. Beartracks Sunday #15
RULES ONLY APPLY TO DEMS, RIGHT? Exp Sunday #18
ANY MEANS NECESSARY czarjak Sunday #21
Doesn't seem very productive. mdbl Sunday #22
Like the LEO's are afraid of breaking a nail single-handedly apprehending a person, I think our Democratic leaders are LiberalArkie Sunday #23
Almost half the country still support Trump!!! kirby Sunday #24
That's what my husband keeps saying Tree Lady Sunday #41
A lot of media make sure many still support him. They hide the truth of his mental illness so they have 'access' Attilatheblond Monday #45
Dems are channeling Merrick Garland Tetrachloride Sunday #26
I was listening to a pod-caster video Dan Sunday #27
"This Pod-caster advocated for a third party..." MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #35
Don't remember Dan Sunday #36
The Democratic Party has historically been the larger of two parties Warpy Sunday #28
I am hearing dems say a lot and the press ignores them. I have heard great speeches in congress. But, people keep mucifer Sunday #29
I've been wondering what has happened to Princess. She used to be able to rein in Daddy Dearest a bit and surely Vinca Sunday #31
She won't do anything to slow the money boats docking at her shore. Attilatheblond Monday #46
They are saying it MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #32
These "Why don't Democrats stop Republicans?" whines are boring. A milquetoast bash. betsuni Monday #49
We need someone to write a strongly worded letter. doc03 Sunday #33
Democrats have said things like that and more but I am wondering JI7 Sunday #34
Democrats like us have been saying that for more than a decade. So has the Democratic minority in the Senate and the Martin68 Sunday #38
It's why.... RetiredParatrooper Monday #42
Just three things. usonian Monday #43
a great question samsingh Monday #47
Some are. barbtries Monday #48
Chris Murphy should be the Senate minority leader. Scrivener7 Monday #55
Not a chance of that until the next Congress. maxsolomon Monday #58
Yeah, I know. Scrivener7 Monday #59
I was pretty bad at math and don't get the New Division Torchlight Monday #50
They are saying it. maxsolomon Monday #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why can't Democrats just ...»Reply #27