Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(114,444 posts)
28. The Democratic Party has historically been the larger of two parties
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 02:56 PM
Sunday

precisely because the power center has been pro corporate even as the periphery has nearly always defended the constitution and the amendments to it. As much as we'd love to return to January 1933-January 1937, the first four years of FDRs presidency were an aberration, forcing sweeping changes where they were most needed because the country was in economic crisis and quite frankly facing revolution.

That's one reason the party won't go there, they have almost as much of a stake in keeping the game going as the radical plutocrats, tech bros, and crypto dudes do. They do, however, see the next crisis on the horizon and will try to take steps to prevent the worst of it. That's why I'm a registered Democrat, even though Social Democrat* is closer to the truth.

Don't expect radical change from the Democatic Party until and unless the country experiences another massive economic crash. Changes will be so incremental as to be invisible until then. However, the Republicans have always met crisis with total paralysis, their dogma blinding them to what the crisis actually consists of, let alone allowing them to deal with it effectively. That's the other reaon I'm a registered Democrat.


*Democratic Socialism: Moves toward decentralized and democratically controlled ownership of all facets of the economy with the eventual goal of abolishing capitalism altogether. It sounds pretty good but is open to real abuse and can devolve faster than cyclical capitalism does, along with stifling innovation and lessening productivity. See: Rssia, although this wasn't their only problem, the main one being that the Boilsheviks hated democracy.

Social Democrats: A mixed system of socialism and capitalism is created, with things moving back and forth between the two paradigms as a socialist entity stagnates or a capitalist entity becomes predatory. This blunts the destructiveness of capitalism while allowing it to exist since it's capable of quicker response to changing human needs.

I can deal with messy. Purity is for plaster saints.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why can't Democrats just say it: [View all] Chasstev365 Sunday OP
They can do that. Just saying the GOP is standing in the way of better healthcare, affordability & stability works too. dutch777 Sunday #1
There is so much low hanging fruit that we are not picking. The messaging Scrivener7 Sunday #2
I stand boggled with you, S7. yellow dahlia Sunday #39
Maybe they'll suggest Republicans wear body cams n/t leftstreet Sunday #3
Jason Crow said it, gab13by13 Sunday #4
I don't think we can wait that long. Jan 2027 if a new Congress is seated. paleotn Sunday #12
That Alaska airborn unit's planned deployment to Minnesota is not actually for Minnesota. Scrivener7 Monday #56
Again, we are waiting on something that may not happen. hamsterjill Sunday #20
Post removed Post removed Monday #44
I believe taking a stand now and fighting them Hey Joe Monday #51
No, NO!! We must focus on the Abundance Agenda, because that's what our consultants said!!! hatrack Sunday #5
I guess Hakeem Jefferies, Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, AOC, et al. didn't get the memo? paleotn Sunday #11
Also Jamie Raskin, Eric Swalwell, and many others ShazzieB Sunday #25
I get tired of that particular Dem bashing line too BaronChocula Sunday #37
Evidently one can be a "supporter" giving "constructive criticism" by lying about what Democrats do/say and do not. betsuni Monday #54
You mean the Elissa Slotkin choie Monday #52
We do Democrats always have to present a positive message and agenda that the corporate media ignores? Chasstev365 Sunday #16
Fire all the consultants. yellow dahlia Sunday #40
I'm a Democrat and I'm saying, as are you too, I assume. Some elected Dems are saying it too-- like Jasmine Crockett! LymphocyteLover Sunday #6
Sometimes Katcat Sunday #7
Really no downside to much these days. paleotn Sunday #8
Coloring within the lines for decorum's sake only guarantees Democrats march in an orderly fashion to the camps. Efilroft Sul Sunday #9
We say that all the time creeksneakers2 Sunday #10
Schumer: "The bottom line is, Senate Republicans continually fall in line behind Donald Trump, no matter how reckless, betsuni Sunday #13
You can be a supporter choie Monday #53
Why don't Democrats use some random phrasing that came out of your head? Gee, I don't know? tritsofme Sunday #14
Reread my original post: You missed my point entirely Chasstev365 Sunday #17
It's just not true. Democrats denounce Republicans for falling behind Trump all the time. tritsofme Sunday #19
Yes, it's not true. Gaslights make it pretty dim in here. betsuni Sunday #30
Yes - the problem with the Republican party is REPUBLICANS, not just Trump. Beartracks Sunday #15
RULES ONLY APPLY TO DEMS, RIGHT? Exp Sunday #18
ANY MEANS NECESSARY czarjak Sunday #21
Doesn't seem very productive. mdbl Sunday #22
Like the LEO's are afraid of breaking a nail single-handedly apprehending a person, I think our Democratic leaders are LiberalArkie Sunday #23
Almost half the country still support Trump!!! kirby Sunday #24
That's what my husband keeps saying Tree Lady Sunday #41
A lot of media make sure many still support him. They hide the truth of his mental illness so they have 'access' Attilatheblond Monday #45
Dems are channeling Merrick Garland Tetrachloride Sunday #26
I was listening to a pod-caster video Dan Sunday #27
"This Pod-caster advocated for a third party..." MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #35
Don't remember Dan Sunday #36
The Democratic Party has historically been the larger of two parties Warpy Sunday #28
I am hearing dems say a lot and the press ignores them. I have heard great speeches in congress. But, people keep mucifer Sunday #29
I've been wondering what has happened to Princess. She used to be able to rein in Daddy Dearest a bit and surely Vinca Sunday #31
She won't do anything to slow the money boats docking at her shore. Attilatheblond Monday #46
They are saying it MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #32
These "Why don't Democrats stop Republicans?" whines are boring. A milquetoast bash. betsuni Monday #49
We need someone to write a strongly worded letter. doc03 Sunday #33
Democrats have said things like that and more but I am wondering JI7 Sunday #34
Democrats like us have been saying that for more than a decade. So has the Democratic minority in the Senate and the Martin68 Sunday #38
It's why.... RetiredParatrooper Monday #42
Just three things. usonian Monday #43
a great question samsingh Monday #47
Some are. barbtries Monday #48
Chris Murphy should be the Senate minority leader. Scrivener7 Monday #55
Not a chance of that until the next Congress. maxsolomon Monday #58
Yeah, I know. Scrivener7 Monday #59
I was pretty bad at math and don't get the New Division Torchlight Monday #50
They are saying it. maxsolomon Monday #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why can't Democrats just ...»Reply #28