Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(52,943 posts)
3. No, that's not a junk fee
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 01:17 PM
7 hrs ago

What he's getting rid of is all the crap hotels are using to get their properties listed higher on websites like hotels.com and travelocity.com when someone selects "view by price low to high." If you're charging, say, $300 per night and adding on $100 in junk fees, you'll be higher on the list (and more likely to be booked) than if you charge $400 per night with no junk fees.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Does that include the NYC Hotel Occupancy Tax? MichMan 9 hrs ago #1
No, that's not a junk fee jmowreader 7 hrs ago #3
Seriously... Prairie Gates 7 hrs ago #6
DURec leftstreet 9 hrs ago #2
That's great Renew Deal 7 hrs ago #4
Brilliant JCMach1 7 hrs ago #5
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mayor Mamdani is banning ...»Reply #3