Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Have Schumer and Jefferies forgotten how to hold a press conference? [View all]lapucelle
(20,956 posts)125. No, Hakeem Jeffries did not vote to confirm Kushner as ambassador to France.
Where did this piece of misinformation come from?
Let's review some basic civics and revisit the constitution. It is the US Senate that votes to confirm those whom the president nominates as ambassadors.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-3-4/ALDE_00013095/
====================
Hakeem Jeffries is a congressman, not a senator. He serves in the House, not the Senate.
Members of the House don't get to vote for or against ambassadorial nominations.
----------------------------------------------
Here is a link to the roll call confirmation vote to confirm Charles Kushner ambassador to France.
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00261.htm#position
=========================
Misinformation about Democrats should be corrected, lest it be repeated to the point that it morphs into disinformation.
Who benefits from misinformation and/or disinformation about our Party's congressional leaders?
Cui bono?
Not Democrats.
Let's review some basic civics and revisit the constitution. It is the US Senate that votes to confirm those whom the president nominates as ambassadors.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2:
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-3-4/ALDE_00013095/
====================
Hakeem Jeffries is a congressman, not a senator. He serves in the House, not the Senate.
Members of the House don't get to vote for or against ambassadorial nominations.
----------------------------------------------
Here is a link to the roll call confirmation vote to confirm Charles Kushner ambassador to France.
Roll Call Vote 119th Congress - 1st Session
Question: On the Nomination (Confirmation: Charles Kushner, of New York, to be Ambassador of the United States of America to the French Republic and the Principality of Monaco)
Question: On the Nomination (Confirmation: Charles Kushner, of New York, to be Ambassador of the United States of America to the French Republic and the Principality of Monaco)
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00261.htm#position
=========================
Misinformation about Democrats should be corrected, lest it be repeated to the point that it morphs into disinformation.
Who benefits from misinformation and/or disinformation about our Party's congressional leaders?
Cui bono?
Not Democrats.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Have Schumer and Jefferies forgotten how to hold a press conference? [View all]
Chasstev365
13 hrs ago
OP
Whatever they ARE doing, it's not enough. It's ridiculous they aren't capitalizing on this moment of abject madness by
LymphocyteLover
13 hrs ago
#1
Yeah, because timidity has been such a triumph for Democrats, all these years.
Paladin
12 hrs ago
#18
I think you're confusing him with Se. Cory Booker.. people in the House don't vote to approve apointees.
LymphocyteLover
5 hrs ago
#111
The Supreme Court's decision to allow unlimited campaign donations and dark money
Bozvotros
5 hrs ago
#117
No, Hakeem Jeffries did not vote to confirm Kushner as ambassador to France.
lapucelle
4 hrs ago
#125
This is NOT a sound strategy. How about talking about compassion, empathy and pounding on the moral compass? n/t
PatrickforB
8 hrs ago
#84
The flip side of that line of thought is Dems need to peak in November, not now.
bucolic_frolic
6 hrs ago
#100
Yes, I'm sure that's what they are doing but as others here have pointed out, that safe strategy is not enough for our
LymphocyteLover
5 hrs ago
#113
And, the fact that they are also shooting other people while they are shooting themselves in the foot is okay?
OldBaldy1701E
11 hrs ago
#24
They are not shooting anyone in the foot. They are shooting people in the eye and in the face.
Autumn
3 hrs ago
#130
Can I solve this? What kind of moronic question is that? Of course I can't.
Scrivener7
2 hrs ago
#140
And the files.... Have to remember that Epstein was a big Democratic Party supporter and financial guy.
LiberalArkie
12 hrs ago
#19
Can you give us a recap of today's press conference and your thoughts on it?
W_HAMILTON
5 hrs ago
#110
He's in the office because someone's eggs were supposedly to expensive. (Which is bullshit).
Ray Bruns
10 hrs ago
#48
DemDUer's with absolute opposite opinions- in the end I sure hope we all pull on the same rope.
NoMoreRepugs
12 hrs ago
#14
We will win - because victory will come to us in due time - if we pray hard and wait long enough.
dalton99a
11 hrs ago
#20
I don't remember god climbing down off his throne to help the people the Nazis murdered.
Autumn
3 hrs ago
#131
Ah, the magic fighting spirit press conference that Americans huddled 'round the TV like in the '60s
betsuni
11 hrs ago
#26
Waiting for the "rope" portion of the 'rope-a-dope' program? 🤷♀️
littlemissmartypants
11 hrs ago
#27
There are lots of Dems in both houses who would be much tougher than those two.
ratchiweenie
10 hrs ago
#45
Think they will slowly ramp up as we get into Spring. Citizens attention span is as long as a hummingbirds wing flap n/t
Cheezoholic
10 hrs ago
#49
Not a Cuomo fan, but I appreciated his daily pressers during Covid
JonAndKatePlusABird
10 hrs ago
#68
It looks to me like Sun Tzu agrees with me (and himself since I borrowed his point).
hay rick
9 hrs ago
#77
Au contraire , They want to talk about bipartisanship to solve the affordability crisis.
flashman13
7 hrs ago
#89
Ironic that as Jeffries is giving a press conference right now, no one here is talking about it.
W_HAMILTON
6 hrs ago
#91
"Maybe those that wanted a press conference so badly can start a live thread here now to discuss it?"
LudwigPastorius
6 hrs ago
#97
Then it's "Finally breaking their silence" -- they totally want a press conference, just not THAT press conference.
betsuni
1 hr ago
#148
that's why we are not in power. trump would have been spouting crap and lies, but he
samsingh
4 hrs ago
#126
Holding a press conference would take more courage than either one of them has.
red dog 1
3 hrs ago
#136