Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RockCreek

(1,416 posts)
29. Why aren't legal release orders for Immediate release?
Sat Jan 31, 2026, 01:50 AM
11 hrs ago

With the release being to the state of (for example) Minnesota? or a non- profit agency with people always available?
I know little of this part if the system, but why isn't, for example,
An order delivered with people assigned to take custody accompanying, and ready to go wherever necessary to get the person (within the judge's jurusdiction)? If the person no longer in state and ordered not to remove person from state, then the perpetrators are already in violation and need to be brought in front if the judge immediately and/or thrown in jail awaiting a hearing for their violations. No bail. Etc.
The people that would take custody can then arrange for a humane release not dumped on the streets thousands of miles from home.
And immediate means immediate. If not immediate the people involved are violation. The violation is not erased by release.
ICE etc whisk people around from state to state, and out of the country,so quickly that there are clearly no time consuming paperwork requirements that need to be followed before release.

The time given to enact judicial orders seems to be part of what ICE etc use to f--k around with the system. The court system needs to respond appropriately.

Eddited to ADD: the Jan 6th traitor were released pretty damn near immediately. The system must be made to respond as diligently and quickly to a judge's orders as to the president's.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And yet we still hear "But he won't do that. It's against the law!" Whyisthisstillclose Yesterday #1
It's over Timewas Yesterday #2
Yup. OldBaldy1701E 23 hrs ago #5
As it is with the international rule of law. PhylliPretzel 21 hrs ago #21
This is what Trump does D_Master81 23 hrs ago #3
The Roy Cohn play book. BattleRow 23 hrs ago #6
We have to quit saying Trump popsdenver 23 hrs ago #7
Also serving himself. Justice matters. 23 hrs ago #11
Stephen Miller will not have the public support that Trump does JI7 14 hrs ago #25
He doesn't have the public support now whopis01 5 hrs ago #30
Trump is the President and he does have a lot of public support JI7 3 hrs ago #31
Thats how he ran his businesss. Nt Callie1979 22 hrs ago #17
Justice BidenRocks 23 hrs ago #4
Ta HELL with a choice... GiqueCee 22 hrs ago #12
When the people are barred from using legal, nonviolent methods of protest Orrex 23 hrs ago #8
JFK Lokee11 14 hrs ago #24
What the fuck is he afraid of? choie 23 hrs ago #9
It's time to start listing republican-owned assets tonekat 23 hrs ago #10
I do NOT understand the system, BUT if we have lifetime judges deciding to fold and give up what can be done? bluestarone 22 hrs ago #13
IMO- President Obama's biggest mistake... Snackshack 22 hrs ago #14
And Biden believing that "there's an awful lot of really good Republicans out there" that he could work with progressoid 22 hrs ago #15
Biden was old school Democrat. Where the differences between parties was very minor. Really just financial. LiberalArkie 22 hrs ago #16
That judge halted the contempt BumRushDaShow 22 hrs ago #18
One problem is that you have to have a specific victim of an order for contempt to be a thing dsc 22 hrs ago #19
It's like my step-daughter and her son...... "David, stop doing that. 3Hotdogs 22 hrs ago #20
Or like some parents say to their misbehaving kids Seinan Sensei 13 hrs ago #26
None of the other cases was the SUBJECT of this action. They were just part of the evidence. pnwmom 18 hrs ago #22
I have seen this a couple times now angrychair 15 hrs ago #23
I don't think that's what either article meant. pnwmom 13 hrs ago #28
I Said the Same Thing Yesterday Roy Rolling 13 hrs ago #27
Why aren't legal release orders for Immediate release? RockCreek 11 hrs ago #29
They have been ignoring court orders in Illinois, too. mucifer 2 hrs ago #32
judging is hard. nt Javaman 58 min ago #33
FOLLOW THE MONEY !!!! usaf-vet 25 min ago #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Minnesota Chief Judge Fol...»Reply #29