Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

PCIntern

(28,445 posts)
Sun Feb 1, 2026, 05:58 PM Feb 1

I am good and goddamned sick and tired of reading or hearing the following clause: [View all]

“Today, President Trump said…”

Since what he says or doesn’t say is either a bald-faced lie or fronto-temporal-influenced gabble -degook, what the actual fuck does it really matter at all whatsoever what he said?

It reminds me of the time just prior to the Gulf War when all the news outlets would “report”: “Today, Saddam Hussein said…”

Yes, I am well aware that reportage must needs include the quotation, but isn’t it “something” that our press does not add the proviso “let it be stated for the record that this President has told tens of thousands of lies and gross exaggerations, so it might be prudent to take today’s statement with the proverbial grain of salt until it can be verified.” Or better, “ Our staff has thoroughly researched the validity of this statement and found it to be, as many of his pronouncements are, false in many (all) respects.”

But no. Even though this sociopathic ephebophile has never knowingly told the truth in his lifetime, it is reported as a fact upon initial presentation, and since we have a torrent/firehose of lies, no amount of evidence to the contrary can possibly make up for the initial statement/lie/untruth/prevarication/bullshit. I had a member of my former family of acquisition who considered himself very bright and informed who bought into this nonsense and was exasperated by sane individuals’ contradictions. Very stupid and frustrating. And moronic. And worthy of gnashing of teeth.

But my favorite thing on the news shows is when they’re interviewing a Democrat and ask him or her “Well, the President said such and such.” and the Democrat responds to the lie with the Truth, the interviewer then says dismissively , “Well, we are going to have to leave it there.” And so without discussion, the topic and victory go to the President/Liar. Now when a Republican is interviewed and asked about a Democrat, he or she is given full rein to blather on and on and ascribe not only the “evil motive” to this Democrat, but every ill in the USAand around the world is the fault of the Dem and of course, the Party at-large. Fuck these assholes.

Rant complete.

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kick and recommend. Reporters are stenographers if bronxiteforever Feb 1 #1
So much is just regurgitated garbage. Used to be humans doing the vomiting but now it's just the bots. erronis Feb 1 #13
I'm sick of seeing and hearing him literally every day Skittles Feb 1 #2
During the campaign of 2024, The Washington Post... CBHagman Feb 1 #11
Obama and Biden Cirsium Feb 1 #3
The absolute worst popsdenver Feb 1 #25
Same here. 2naSalit Feb 1 #4
Or at least, "The president released yet another nonsensical rant on the topic, claiming..." tanyev Feb 1 #5
That works. yellow dahlia Feb 1 #10
That's why I think Democrats should boycott the State of the Union and present their own TRUTHFUL Scrivener7 Feb 1 #6
Hear! Hear! yellow dahlia Feb 1 #9
There will likely be a "State of the Union Response" after Trump gets his in. calimary Feb 1 #18
But I'm talking about a different point. Our leaders should not give him an audience. Scrivener7 Feb 1 #19
Either boycott the SotU speech, or: Martin Eden Feb 2 #33
I think that gives him too much attention and legitimacy. Just don't waste their time attending at all. Scrivener7 Feb 2 #34
Either way, whatever the Democrats do will garner attention Martin Eden Feb 2 #36
Thank you for posting this. CBHagman Feb 1 #7
Good rant. yellow dahlia Feb 1 #8
Lawrence O'Donnell always uses "Donald Trump" and never says "President." 3catwoman3 Feb 1 #30
Yep. yellow dahlia Feb 1 #31
Agree. The word "president" should never be used with his name. Katinfl Feb 2 #41
Me too Rebl2 Feb 1 #12
My "google news" page shows 4 or 5 separate sections with trump pontifications. erronis Feb 1 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author jfz9580m Feb 2 #38
For accuracy's sake, every new story featuring anything TSF says should begin... Trueblue Texan Feb 1 #15
Righteous Rant... spanone Feb 1 #16
You are absolutely correct. Buddyzbuddy Feb 1 #17
Yeah. GoodRaisin Feb 1 #20
Yes! Roy Rolling Feb 1 #21
Exactly so! Whatever Democrat disagrees with Chump gets dismissed immediately FakeNoose Feb 1 #22
WHO is President??? tazcat Feb 1 #23
This is probably the best post I have read on this forum. nm mikewv Feb 1 #24
Thank you for telling the truth about the complicit media Keepthesoulalive Feb 1 #26
The day is coming when "President Trump" Croney Feb 1 #27
I hate hearing the word "unprecedented" vapor2 Feb 1 #28
We don't have Trump Derangement Syndrome, we have... 3catwoman3 Feb 1 #29
"Let's remember that Donald Trump is a pathological liar with zero credibility" Martin Eden Feb 2 #32
"So let it be written, so let it be done" dalton99a Feb 2 #35
I think you meant "ephebophile". Arrived at puberty. 15-16 years old, typically. SharonAnn Feb 2 #37
Thanks. PCIntern Feb 2 #39
Ephebophile is a new word to me for which I thank you, but yes, it's horribke that such a person... NNadir Feb 2 #40
Even worse: Today trump threatened... radical noodle Feb 2 #42
Amen camartinwv Feb 2 #43
Yes, agree LymphocyteLover Feb 2 #44
Faux president Clouds Passing Feb 2 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am good and goddamned s...