Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(13,882 posts)
25. And so it is. Attempted theft. However you look at it.
Fri May 22, 2026, 12:09 AM
5 hrs ago

The executive branch has no power to set up such a fund. And a so-called "contract" -- whatever the terms -- between a president and the agencies that president controls is absolutely NOT a "settlement" in any way shape or form.

And in fact I can't imagine how the document qualifies as a contract that has any legal force whatsoever. It is a contract to payout money that neither party to the contract has any legal authority over the distribution of.

Perhaps there is some bullshit "legal" argument, but the thing is that the law is not actually all that complex. As far as I'm concerned, however you slice it, this is an attempt to usurp Congressional power in words of an agreement that violates the right of "We the People" to determine how moneys appropriated are spent. The Executive Branch has NO place, except to execute OUR WILL as represented in OUR Laws. The agreement does not qualify.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ari Melber called it a "Thug" Fund. yellow dahlia 14 hrs ago #1
At least WAPO had the decency to put it in quotes. pat_k 14 hrs ago #7
Weisman called it theft. GoodRaisin 13 hrs ago #10
And so it is. Attempted theft. However you look at it. pat_k 5 hrs ago #25
If Trump robbed a bank at gunpoint, everyone would just call it a "settlement." Irish_Dem 14 hrs ago #2
The next president better check that he hasn't made off with fort knox gold a la Marcos. pat_k 13 hrs ago #8
100% certain trump has already made off with some gold Irish_Dem 13 hrs ago #9
Given his obsession with gold, you're probably right. pat_k 7 hrs ago #24
or shot someone on Fifth Avenue MadameButterfly 12 hrs ago #18
Part of his presidential duties. Irish_Dem 12 hrs ago #20
Essentially it's an extortion payout...nt Wounded Bear 14 hrs ago #3
It's not even that because there was no threat. pat_k 14 hrs ago #4
Understand it was a setup. Start a bogus "threat" of a lawsuit and then settle out of court... Wounded Bear 14 hrs ago #5
Yep. Add the con about hey, the IRS cannot audit me for that crime AND Justice matters. 14 hrs ago #6
Well said! The judge herself noted clearly that there was NO "settlement." spooky3 13 hrs ago #11
Al least The Prospect makes this clear... pat_k 12 hrs ago #14
"Cop beaters" slush fund.......Sheldon Whitehouse Bengus81 13 hrs ago #12
One or two cops were killed. MLWR 12 hrs ago #13
Officer Brian Sicknick's death the following night was clearly a direct result pat_k 12 hrs ago #19
Cop killers reward money. BattleRow 11 hrs ago #22
"Anti Law Enforcement Slush Fund" RB77 11 hrs ago #23
Judge is taking the position that the lawsuit does not include any settlement LetMyPeopleVote 12 hrs ago #15
"there is no settlement of record" pat_k 12 hrs ago #17
SETTLEMENT MY ASS! BBbats 12 hrs ago #16
Amen. SergeStorms 12 hrs ago #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Stop calling it an f-ing ...»Reply #25