Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: SCOTUS holds states can count late-arriving mail-in ballots that are postmarked on or before Election Day [View all]kentuck
(116,096 posts)6. Does this ruling shoot down the proposed SAVE Act...
...before it is passed?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
SCOTUS holds states can count late-arriving mail-in ballots that are postmarked on or before Election Day [View all]
In It to Win It
7 hrs ago
OP
Amy Barrett has had a couple of ruling which favored The People IMHO--but admit I already forget which ones.
riversedge
7 hrs ago
#4
Maybe Trump will alienate some more women with a typical nasty comment. Would be a win for us.
RoeVWade
6 hrs ago
#7
Oh, yes, T and A, as I like to call them, will ALWAYS be as extreme as possible.
ShazzieB
4 hrs ago
#44
It appears that Amy Coney Barret has become the deciding vote on this Supreme Court.
kentuck
7 hrs ago
#5
But what about the post office refusing to mail ballots in states that don't supply dump with the voter lists
CurtEastPoint
6 hrs ago
#9
WTF. This should be a fucking no brainer since the vote was cast during an election.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
6 hrs ago
#14
Wow, a rare SCOTUS decision not in favor of the Murdoch Ministry Of Propaganda! What's next?
Initech
6 hrs ago
#15