General Discussion

RoeVWade

(967 posts)

7. Maybe Trump will alienate some more women with a typical nasty comment. Would be a win for us.

Reply to riversedge (Reply #4)

Mon Jun 29, 2026, 10:39 AM

9 hrs ago

Weird but seems true.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

BlueMTexpat Dixc byronius RockCreek

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCOTUS holds states can count late-arriving mail-in ballots that are postmarked on or before Election Day [View all] In It to Win It 10 hrs ago OP

Good Aviation Pro 10 hrs ago #1

WOW... Hate to say it ordinarily, but thank you Amy Coney Barrett hlthe2b 10 hrs ago #2

Amy Barrett has had a couple of ruling which favored The People IMHO--but admit I already forget which ones. riversedge 9 hrs ago #4

Maybe Trump will alienate some more women with a typical nasty comment. Would be a win for us. RoeVWade 9 hrs ago #7

Yes, she has come across as a bit more PatSeg 9 hrs ago #10

Oh, yes, T and A, as I like to call them, will ALWAYS be as extreme as possible. ShazzieB 7 hrs ago #44

I'll be happy with an age or health related retirement PatSeg 6 hrs ago #46

Ketchup will be flying... SheltieLover 9 hrs ago #3

It appears that Amy Coney Barret has become the deciding vote on this Supreme Court. kentuck 9 hrs ago #5

Does this ruling shoot down the proposed SAVE Act... kentuck 9 hrs ago #6

No Sympthsical 9 hrs ago #8

But this is the law until Congress votes to change it? kentuck 9 hrs ago #12

Yes, this is law until Congress passes new law that changes it. In It to Win It 9 hrs ago #16

Congress can still try to change those laws. Ms. Toad 9 hrs ago #13

Yeah, the SAVE Act would absolutely end up in front of the Court Sympthsical 9 hrs ago #19

Would that require homegirl 8 hrs ago #20

Currently the SAVE act is being blocked by the Senate, Ms. Toad 8 hrs ago #26

But what about the post office refusing to mail ballots in states that don't supply dump with the voter lists CurtEastPoint 9 hrs ago #9

I believe this is being challenged PatSeg 9 hrs ago #11

Blocked by Federal Court judge last week. paleotn 8 hrs ago #25

AMAZING! Thanks! CurtEastPoint 8 hrs ago #35

WTF. This should be a fucking no brainer since the vote was cast during an election. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist 9 hrs ago #14

Some areas keep the post office open until midnight MichMan 8 hrs ago #30

Wow, a rare SCOTUS decision not in favor of the Murdoch Ministry Of Propaganda! What's next? Initech 9 hrs ago #15

A good ruling MustLoveBeagles 8 hrs ago #37

Well, we got to take whatever wins we can get! Initech 8 hrs ago #38

I'm in agreement MustLoveBeagles 7 hrs ago #40

I'm going to guess they pull nonsense on birthright citizenship EnergizedLib 9 hrs ago #17

State CAN count them or MUST count them? Blumancru 9 hrs ago #18

It depends on state laws MichMan 8 hrs ago #22

It's important that blue voters in states that DON'T allow those delivered after the election day are aware of this. RockCreek 2 hrs ago #47

Just 'forget' to postmark ones in blue districts... kirby 8 hrs ago #21

Or someone will come up with their own copy of a postmark. MichMan 8 hrs ago #23

But will the post office post mark them? yellowcanine 8 hrs ago #24

Good malaise 8 hrs ago #27

Bottom line MoseShrute 8 hrs ago #28

This jives with contract law - postmark dates a contract bucolic_frolic 8 hrs ago #29

This would have been a no brainer to probably every other Supreme Court. crud 8 hrs ago #31

That 2000 election, popsdenver 7 hrs ago #41

The Extreme Court has the "shadow docket" Soul_of_Wit 7 hrs ago #43

Why would anyone wait until election day to use a mail in ballot? MichMan 8 hrs ago #32

The undersranding used to be because it would be counted and also because things change dramatically (esp in primaries) SSJVegeta 8 hrs ago #34

An actual example usage of "procrastinate" from Merriam-Webster.com Soul_of_Wit 8 hrs ago #39

Barrett has been the most democratic member of the anti-democracy court SSJVegeta 8 hrs ago #33

Barrett just told the GOP how to change federal law Raven123 8 hrs ago #36

Just more evidence to me the Supreme Court must be expanded standingtall 7 hrs ago #42

Scotland ABC123Easy 6 hrs ago #45