Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)'Horrible' Sea Level Rise Of More Than 3 Feet Plausible By 2100, Experts Say - NBC [View all]
'Horrible' sea level rise of more than 3 feet plausible by 2100, experts sayBy John Roach, NBC News
1/6/12
<snip>
Melting glaciers in Antarctica and Greenland may push up global sea levels more than 3 feet by the end of this century, according to a scientific poll of experts that brings a degree of clarity to a murky and controversial slice of climate science. Such a rise in the seas would displace millions of people from low-lying countries such as Bangladesh, swamp atolls in the Pacific Ocean, cause dikes in Holland to fail, and cost coastal mega-cities from New York to Tokyo billions of dollars for construction of sea walls and other infrastructure to combat the tides.
"The consequences are horrible," Jonathan Bamber, a glaciologist at the University of Bristol and a co-author of the study published Jan. 6 in the journal Nature Climate Change, told NBC News.
Estimating how much sea levels will rise from ice sheet melting is one of the more challenging aspects of climate science. Some evidence suggests recent accelerated melting is related to changes in ocean and atmospheric temperature, though natural variability may play an important role. In addition, glaciers respond to external forces such as warmer temperatures in different ways, even when they are located right next to each other. As a result, there is tremendous uncertainty in the scientific community over how the melting will affect sea levels over the next century.
Bamber and colleague Willy Aspinall attempted to find clarity in the chaos using a scientific polling technique common in fields such as predicting earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, but until now not applied to climate science. The pair sent 26 of the world's leading glaciologists a series of questions about the behavior of the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets. About half replied to the survey in 2010. The respondents were polled again in 2012 to assess the robustness of their answers.
Bamber said this type of approach is "a lot more than an opinion poll." The experts were handpicked to get a representative perspective of world leaders from the ice sheet modeling and observational fields. "We analyzed the results in a very systematic, rigorous, and statistically robust way," he added.
The median estimate from the experts is that the melting ice sheets will contribute 1 foot (29 centimeters) to sea level rise by the year 2100 with a 5 percent chance their contribution could exceed 2.8 feet (84 centimeters). When the effect of thermal expansion (water expands as it warms) is taken into account, the high-end estimate is more than 3 feet (1 meter).
<snip>
More: http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/06/16369939-horrible-sea-level-rise-of-more-than-3-feet-plausible-by-2100-experts-say?lite
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Horrible' Sea Level Rise Of More Than 3 Feet Plausible By 2100, Experts Say - NBC [View all]
WillyT
Jan 2013
OP
hover-crafts are so 90s, you might as well wear paisley. I'm going stealth drone!
nilram
Jan 2013
#27
Yup...I agree...every dire prediction has had to be revised to a nearer date..
truebrit71
Jan 2013
#38
According to some we are looking at an ice free summer arctic by 2015...not the next 15 years
truebrit71
Jan 2013
#65
This summer all the continental shelf area was open; but will the deep arctic area thaw as fast?
FarCenter
Jan 2013
#68
Peter Wadhams is the only person I know of that has pegged 2015 as the year.
AverageJoe90
Jan 2013
#74
maybe we'll call a meeting to discuss how to develop a plan to hold a summit to convene the leading
stuntcat
Jan 2013
#10
Yeah... The Part That Is Sittting On The Seabed Will Not Cause Sea Levels To Rise, But...
WillyT
Jan 2013
#22
The ice sitting on the seabed will cause the ocean to rise if it melts, since its not floating.
HooptieWagon
Jan 2013
#32
(a) HooptieWagon said that ice on land would raise sea level when it melts
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2013
#84
While it can't have the really big effects of land ice melting, it could still be significant
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2013
#78
Given that there are already areas that need to rebuild 18 feet higher, does 3 more make a differenc
FarCenter
Jan 2013
#12
What matters is how high the water gets - tides, surge, waves and sea level rise combined
FarCenter
Jan 2013
#44
What a bunch of hand waving! No data on damages, cost of mitigation, cost of barriers, cost of moves
FarCenter
Jan 2013
#61
Frequency of Sandy-like flooding will depend on the weather; Bangladesh is screwed in any case.
FarCenter
Jan 2013
#64
South of Great Egg Harbor, everything east of the Garden State Parkway is in a FEMA flood zone
FarCenter
Jan 2013
#58
when it happens within 5 years then they'll say the models weren't good enough
lunatica
Jan 2013
#37
Are you really saying that Antartica's only been the way it is for 1,000 years?
AverageJoe90
Jan 2013
#83
How about a little entertainment on the topic, as we wait before the deluge...
DreamGypsy
Jan 2013
#105