Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Jbradshaw120

(80 posts)

6. no worries

Reply to Whovian (Reply #5)

Mon Jan 7, 2013, 04:12 PM

Jan 2013

I just wanted to make sure that montana was not unnecessarily lumped into a group of anti-union. Also I would not dispute the figures as they are most likely correct we are toward the bottom of wages and such, we have continued to drop as our union density dropped, so i would not dispute the figures just the characterization of anti-union.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Want to live in a non-union state? [View all] Whovian Jan 2013 OP

I have always lived where the Union was proud! liberal N proud Jan 2013 #1

just a coincidence barbtries Jan 2013 #2

Oh Oh,you forgot one of Wellstone ruled Jan 2013 #3

I understand what you are trying to do Jbradshaw120 Jan 2013 #4

Thanks for pointing this out. Whovian Jan 2013 #5

no worries Jbradshaw120 Jan 2013 #6

Closed shop? I thought Taft-Hartley outlawed those? n/t white_wolf Jan 2013 #7

yes you are right. Jbradshaw120 Jan 2013 #8