Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The saddest graph you’ll see today [View all]caseymoz
(5,763 posts)32. By following the links, you find this:
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=dcdetail&iid=245
"NCVS is the Nation's primary source of information on criminal victimization. Each year, data are obtained from a nationally representative sample of about 40,000 households comprising nearly 75,000 persons on the frequency, characteristics and consequences of criminal victimization in the United States. Each household is interviewed twice during the year. The survey enables BJS to estimate the likelihood of victimization by rape, sexual assault, robbery, assault, theft, household burglary, and motor vehicle theft for the population as a whole as well as for segments of the population such as women, the elderly, members of various racial groups, city dwellers, or other groups. The NCVS provides the largest national forum for victims to describe the impact of crime and characteristics of violent offenders."
The NCVS doesn't rely on police reports, or reporting to any law enforcement agency. It surveys the general public directly about their experience of crime victimization. A sample of 40,000 households are surveyed repeatedly over a three year period, this includes about 70,000 individuals 12 or older.
Links to the questionnaires and the methodology are included in the one above.
The OP's link does have a disclaimer that the methodology is questioned, but I think the proportion is in the ballpark of what's given in the OP's graphic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
100 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you have no idea how the group reached their conclusions, why are you so sure that they are wrong
yardwork
Jan 2013
#78
If you are actually saying that women were threatened with PROSECUTION for reporting a rape-
WCLinolVir
Jan 2013
#76
you are correct. I know someone falsely accused and it cost them about tens time what it cost you
Swagman
Jan 2013
#44
I have no idea what the real figures are but I recall the dodgy US Attorney General claimed
Swagman
Jan 2013
#58
I'm always reluctant to get involved with these discussions but I think a false allegation is so
Swagman
Jan 2013
#12
Try the known discarded police reports from the Met and Manchester and Liverpool
intaglio
Jan 2013
#36
what the fuck is the MRA and it is you spouting rubbish by weaving separate incidents
Swagman
Jan 2013
#57
exactly. what about their lives? I've heard people say that there are so few that it's not
samsingh
Jan 2013
#40
this is what the more hysterical will say uniquely in sex assault cases : it is better for a few
Swagman
Jan 2013
#45
The NCVS works by drawing a geographically stratified random sample of Americans
Jackpine Radical
Jan 2013
#31
how dare you accuse people of being rape apologists because they discuss false accusations
Swagman
Jan 2013
#59
That's what I understood him to be saying. He's gone off in a huff now, putting me on ignore.
yardwork
Jan 2013
#99
I don't see anybody disagreeing with the fact that false accusations are a problem.
yardwork
Jan 2013
#97
what's "faced trial", shouldn't there be jailed, charged, reported, unreported?
snooper2
Jan 2013
#34