General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Voters Tune Out Democrats [View all]Moses2SandyKoufax
(1,290 posts)At Wed Jan 9, 2013, 07:22 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
Why Voters Tune Out Democrats
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022163483
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
YOUR COMMENTS:
Recycled RW gibberish dating back to July 2011 from an obvious RW troll.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Wed Jan 9, 2013, 07:33 PM, and voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: rightwing trash
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This is f/ed up, dkf. Since the discussion is genteel, I am not going to lock it. Why don't you come back and join, though?
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The alerted post is too substantive, too nuanced, and too objectively presented to qualify as "RW gibberish." Besides, dkf is a longstanding DUer. I don't know him/her personally, but I've seen that name around here for too long to beleive he/she is "an obvious troll." Lacking any substantive argument besides simple name-calling, the alerting DUer seems to be someone who just can't handle reading facts he/she doesn't like.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: It is not clear to me why this post was flagged.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I disagree with the post -- and don't particularly like it -- but I am not willing to accept calling someone with 30K posts to this site a "troll" merely on that basis! This is an abuse of the alert system, IMO.
Thank you.