Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
21. I don't give a shit whether they run Tweedle Dum or Tweedle Dee
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:07 PM
Jan 2012

they keep slinging the ugly truth at each other.

The more drawn-out the Primary season, the more dirt gets exposed. They are digging each other's politcial graves.

The Big Shot Party has pulled out all the stops to push Romney. Gingrich has broken his chains & is a Frankenstein's Monster. I just caught some hick radio preacher on a fundie station, and he started with a stinging rebuke of Newt the "liberal, the globalist" followed by a pitch for Romney as God's chosen candidate (or smething like that).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Definitely Romney. yardwork Jan 2012 #1
I agree. Newt brings out the ugliest things DevonRex Jan 2012 #7
I agree. I'd prefer not to even take the chance with Gingrich RZM Jan 2012 #26
Can't see that it will make any difference, really. MineralMan Jan 2012 #2
Romney because of his tax returns AND PA Democrat Jan 2012 #3
Do not care. Both are clowns, just for different reasons. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #4
Definately Romney. He is atypical of our enemy the 1%. The Newt would rhett o rick Jan 2012 #5
Romney, easiest to beat Mr. 1% Raine Jan 2012 #6
Romney. Less ugly campaign, less ugly presidency if the unthinkable were to happen. MH1 Jan 2012 #8
Gingrich will provide a much better show ... bemildred Jan 2012 #9
my gut reaction is nooot. but mittens so embodies the super-rich who have put money before country arely staircase Jan 2012 #10
Gingrich. Gingrich. Gingrich. da_decider Jan 2012 #11
Newt means a landslide, possibly get back congress. Romney means more populist rhetoric. joshcryer Jan 2012 #12
Romney. Newt brings out the worst elements in human nature NAO Jan 2012 #13
Not sure if it matters to ultimate outcome NAO Jan 2012 #14
Either will lose but Gingrich will produce more of a defeat for the right. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #15
Yep, and if you destroy Newt, you destroy the Tea Party and their agenda too. bemildred Jan 2012 #17
Romney would make the perfect example of the 1% that American's are fed up with. glowing Jan 2012 #16
Romney - No Contest Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2012 #18
Mitt Betsy Ross Jan 2012 #19
Both will lose to Obama, but it's tough. gulliver Jan 2012 #20
I don't give a shit whether they run Tweedle Dum or Tweedle Dee Jackpine Radical Jan 2012 #21
No question about it: Gingrich Gman Jan 2012 #22
Both of them need to grow some extra legs between now and November. gkhouston Jan 2012 #23
Romney would just be the 1% loser. Gingrinch would brand the GOP as the creepy organization that it applegrove Jan 2012 #24
They each carry more baggage than an airline Generic Brad Jan 2012 #25
little ricky santorum! MarianJack Jan 2012 #27
Arsenic or Strychnine Kalidurga Jan 2012 #28
Gingrich is so polarizing Obamacare Jan 2012 #29
Gingrich scares the bejeebers out of me. Flubadubya Jan 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Out Of Curiosity... Who W...»Reply #21