Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Perhaps it is time to let it all go to hell and back. [View all]emulatorloo
(46,154 posts)6. Did you know that insurance companies now have to pay 80 to 85 percent of premiums on patient care
http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2010pres/11/20101122a.html
I am sure the insurance industry is loving that.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, November 22, 2010
Contact: HHS Press Office
(202) 690-6343
New Affordable Care Act rules give consumers better value for insurance premiums
New medical loss ratio regulations make insurance marketplace more transparent and require insurers to spend premium dollars on care
New regulations issued today by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) require health insurers to spend 80 to 85 percent of consumers premiums on direct care for patients and efforts to improve care quality. This regulation, known as the medical loss ratio provision of the Affordable Care Act, will make the insurance marketplace more transparent and make it easier for consumers to purchase plans that provide better value for their money.
I am sure the insurance industry is loving that.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, November 22, 2010
Contact: HHS Press Office
(202) 690-6343
New Affordable Care Act rules give consumers better value for insurance premiums
New medical loss ratio regulations make insurance marketplace more transparent and require insurers to spend premium dollars on care
New regulations issued today by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) require health insurers to spend 80 to 85 percent of consumers premiums on direct care for patients and efforts to improve care quality. This regulation, known as the medical loss ratio provision of the Affordable Care Act, will make the insurance marketplace more transparent and make it easier for consumers to purchase plans that provide better value for their money.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I thought the Socialist Revolution was coming after Reagan was elected, LOL
emulatorloo
Dec 2011
#12
I was wondering if that was what is needed earlier today, but fear that our corporate masters
peacebird
Dec 2011
#2
Actually I think you'd have no government. No social security, no social programs, rule by might.
dkf
Dec 2011
#4
Funny, but that is not the eventuality that happened with the French or Germans,
MadHound
Dec 2011
#23
Did you know that insurance companies now have to pay 80 to 85 percent of premiums on patient care
emulatorloo
Dec 2011
#6
What do they care? MRL is set at where the industry is and if it isn't then some CFO's and CEO's
TheKentuckian
Dec 2011
#48
Knowing America, this sort of thing will only make totalitarianism emerge.
HughBeaumont
Dec 2011
#18
Yes, there are those satisfied with the Administration's efforts, however they are in the minority
MadHound
Dec 2011
#31
That's a rather cavalier attitude you have there toward the sufferings and deaths of others...
patrice
Dec 2011
#26
Even if you don't care about your own suffering & death, YOU don't get to decide for others...
patrice
Dec 2011
#29
throw the entire govt to the GOP? i'm all set. hopefully you won't get the disaster you wish for.
dionysus
Dec 2011
#34
I see people whose personal circumstances are less than ideal wanting all of society to fail.
Ikonoklast
Dec 2011
#50
OWS illustrates that many believe we've already reached that point. They're not protesting one party
DirkGently
Dec 2011
#62
Perhaps its time to read the bill, rather than the baloney that has been written about it
bhikkhu
Dec 2011
#64