Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Trident nuclear deterrent 'at risk' if Scotland votes for independence [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(106,132 posts)7. Nice though this would be in theory, I'd like to see the reasoning
It says "they are even less viable now for environmental, cost and other pragmatic reasons". It's not clear that it's impossible to have them somewhere in England; just that all the potential English (or Welsh) bases are worse than the Scottish ones. I'd like to get rid of Trident; but I can't see why it's impossible to have a base in England, where the submarines already enter various ports.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trident nuclear deterrent 'at risk' if Scotland votes for independence [View all]
MichaelMcGuire
Jan 2012
OP
But what if Belgium invades Scotland? Without trident, they have no defense!
ChairmanAgnostic
Jan 2012
#2
Still waiting for the proof. Surely you couldn't make a claim of my "Anti-Englishness" without it?
MichaelMcGuire
Feb 2012
#40
Thanks - that makes more sense than anything specified in the article
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2012
#9
Unlike Iran, Nuclear Britain has a history of aggression against other countries.
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#17
The UK is one of the most aggressive international outlaw states of all time.
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#21