Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

defacto7

(14,162 posts)

2. Yeah, I've been saying that

Reply to Grantuspeace (Original post)

Wed Mar 6, 2013, 02:15 AM

Mar 2013

Kim Jong Un probably isn't in charge for a long time. To match actions with psychological characteristics, it just doesn't make sense that he is calling the shots. He's a military front... a puppet. Something is seriously out of sync.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rodman isn't the ambassador to N. Korea. And Kim Jong Un isn't in charge. [View all] Grantuspeace Mar 2013 OP

I can see Kim Jong Un being executed or assassinated to facilitate the hungry for powerful. Lint Head Mar 2013 #1

Yeah, I've been saying that defacto7 Mar 2013 #2

Sure Kim Jong Un is in charge. David__77 Mar 2013 #3

Kim Jong Un is in trouble his public embrace of Rodman did not help. gordianot Mar 2013 #4

The way he "assumed" power suggests he was "interviewed" for the job. Grantuspeace Mar 2013 #5

just propaganda for the mill. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #6

Some who criticized Obama for being open to a dialog with Iran are upset because he doesn't Grantuspeace Mar 2013 #7

In terms of who's in charge davidpdx Mar 2013 #8

And here I was thinking that Ambassador Rodman made progress Renew Deal Mar 2013 #9

even if kim jong was president of the universe, rodman isn't relevant spanone Mar 2013 #10

It's been subtle but it appears as if there has been a power struggle Javaman Mar 2013 #11